SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. _______________ of 2025 Rangarajan Narasimhan M/55 Sanathana Dharmam/Sri Vaishnavam “Arangan Thirumutram” Kollidam Road 400m west of Andavan Ashramam Srirangam, Trichy – 620 006 …Petitioner Versus 1. The Director General of Police

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. _______________ of 2025 Rangarajan Narasimhan M/55 Sanathana Dharmam/Sri Vaishnavam “Arangan Thirumutram” Kollidam Road 400m west of Andavan Ashramam Srirangam, Trichy – 620 006 …Petitioner Versus 1. The Director General of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. _______________ of 2025 Rangarajan Narasimhan M/55 Sanathana Dharmam/Sri Vaishnavam “Arangan Thirumutram” Kollidam Road 400m west of Andavan Ashramam Srirangam, Trichy –...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

The Madras High Court has directed the state government to appoint complaints officers in all departments to redress the grievances of transgender persons and sought to know whether such officers were already nominated as per the provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

[02/12, 15:25] Sekarreporter: Appoint complaint officers for trans persons: Madras HC The bench also suo motu impleaded the National Council for Transgender Persons under the Union Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment and issued...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Head notes cases mhc

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

Head notes cases mhc

kalaimagal saba case The order details for WA No. 472 of 2024 are as follows: – *Case:* WA No. 472 of 2024 – *Judges:* Honourable Mr. Justice M.S. Ramesh and Honourable Mr. Justice N....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

Madras High Court* – *Judges:* N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman – *Parties:* S.M. Vetrivel (Petitioner) vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of India & Ors. (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* November 25, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Mr. T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Deepika – For Respondents: Dr. G. Balu, Senior Panel Counsel for R2, R5, and R6; Mr. C.K. Chandrasekar for R4 – *Court Observation:* The court disposed of the petition, directing the Bar Council to take a decision as per law regarding reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in future elections. The court clarified that this direction should not come in the way of conducting the ongoing election. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the High Powered Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for exemption from payment of nomination fee.

[02/12, 14:32] Sekarreporter: [02/12, 14:30] Sekarreporter: “Mr.Gowthaman, learned senior counsel would submit that the relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is not to delay or stall the election, only the statutory...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

[02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified (likely December 2, 2025) – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: M. Vijay Anand – For Respondent: Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu government to produce documents related to the tender process for conducting the 50th India Tourism and Industrial Fair at Chennai’s Island Grounds. The petitioner alleged that their bid was rejected on flaky grounds, despite their company having successfully conducted the event six times previously. The court adjourned the case to December 4, seeking further clarification on the tender process. [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/18 WP/47251/2025 (Gen. Misc.) M/S. FUN WORLD AND RESORTS INDIA PVT. LTD., VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND 4 OTHERS. M/S. M.VIJAY ANAND K.S.LEKHA SRI —————— Chennai

[02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 2, 2025

head note: *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS* *WA No. 3250 of 2025* *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.* *Date of Order: 11-11-2025* *Coram:* – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar *Counsel:* – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4) *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.

[02/12, 14:11] Sekarreporter: [02/12, 14:11] Sekarreporter: “For Appellant : Mr.M.Baskar for Mr.K.B.Vivekanandhan” HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WA No. 3250 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 26740 OF...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version