SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN. *Court Observation:* The court is considering appeals against an order dated 30.10.2025, where a learned Single Judge dismissed applications under Section 9 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief. The Single Judge held that Section 9 applications are not maintainable during the pendency of Execution Proceedings before a competent Civil Court. The appellants argue that Section 9 applications are maintainable even after an arbitral award is passed and before its enforcement under Section 36 of the Act.

[06/12, 09:34] Meta AI: The Madras High Court judgment you’re referring to involves appeals against an order dated 30.10.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in Original Application Nos. 997 and 998 of 2025...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Setaside HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN OSA(CAD) Nos.118, 119, 135 & 136 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 27672, 27666, 27675, 27678, 29773, 29775, 29780 & 29782 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN OSA(CAD) Nos.118, 119, 135 & 136 of 2025 AND CMP NO....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Judge Baratha chakraverthy Court Observation:* The review application seeking to review the order dated 12.06.2024 in W.P.No.15468 of 2024 was dismissed. The court had earlier allowed the writ petition, quashing the recovery of excess payment made to the petitioner, based on the principles established by the Supreme Court in State of Punjab and Ors. etc. Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc. The review petitioners argued that the petitioner was a Group-I officer and a Self Drawing Officer, and had given an undertaking to refund excess payments, but the court ultimately dismissed the review application.

[06/12, 09:23] Meta AI: Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy’s review application (No. 226 of 2025) and (link unavailable) 37241 of 2025 have been dismissed. The case involved a suo motu writ petition (W.P.(Crl.) No. 618...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Court Observation:* The court set aside the writ orders impugned, stating they were not in consonance with the principles settled by the Supreme Court of India. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos. 854 and 1645 of 2015 were allowed, while Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos. 1549 and 1550 of 2015 and 1529 and 1530 of 2018 were dismissed.

[06/12, 09:09] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* W.A.Nos. 854, 1549, 1550 & 1645 of 2015, and 1529 & 1530 of 2018 – *Judge:* HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND MR JUSTICE...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Conclusion: 48. In view of the facts and circumstances and the legal position as considered in the aforementioned paragraphs, writ orders impugned are not in consonance with the principles settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and on facts. Consequently, writ orders dated 09.01.2015 in W.P.No.26856 of 2010 and W.P.No.19724 of 2005 and writ orders dated 24.01.2011 in W.P.No.17867 of 2010 and W.P. No.20769 of 2010 are set aside. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.854 and 1645 of 2015 are allowed and Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.1549 and 1550 of 2015 and 1529 and 1530 of 2018 are dismissed. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [S.M.S., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 11.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi/Jeni To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition III),

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.A.Nos.854, 1549, 1550 & 1645 of 2015, and 1529 & 1530...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The conference will conclude with a Valedictory Session graced by Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, Judge, Supreme Court of India, The session will also be graced by Smt. Supriya Sahu, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Environment, Climate Change & Forests, Government of Tamil Nadu, Mr. A.R.L. Sundaresan,

AR REPORTER Uncategorized MM sundaresh Judge sc today function chennai kalaivaner arangam 9.30 /The Zonal Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Chennai, is organizing the Regional Conference on Environment – 2025 on the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version