SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The writ petition in W.P. No.45674 of 2025 was filed by the All India Motor Vehicle Security Association represented by the Learned Counsel Mr. S. Haja Mohideen Gisthi seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the State Transport Department to enforce the affixation of HSRP on older vehicles before 01.04.2025 in accordance with various notifications, advisories, and circulars issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH), similar to the

[08/12, 17:24] Sekarreporter: 1. The writ petition in W.P. No.45674 of 2025 was filed by the All India Motor Vehicle Security Association represented by the Learned Counsel Mr. S. Haja Mohideen Gisthi seeking a...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Supreme Court Relaxes Bail Conditions Of Senthil Balaji, Says Not Needed To Visit ED Office Twice Per Week

Supreme Court Relaxes Bail Conditions Of Senthil Balaji, Says Not Needed To Visit ED Office Twice Per Week

Supreme Court Relaxes Bail Conditions Of Senthil Balaji, Says Not Needed To Visit ED Office Twice Per Week https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/supreme-court-relaxes-bail-conditions-of-senthil-balaji-says-not-needed-to-visit-ed-office-twice-per-week-1600500 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.45674 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.50906 of 2025 All India Motor Vehicle Security Association, Rep. through R Sekar, Authorized Signatory

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.11.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.45674 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.50906 of 2025 All...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan stated that when the power under section 254(2) is akin to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC,   https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/income-tax-s-2542-is-akin-to-order-47-rule-1-cpc-rectification-limited-to-apparent-errors-madras-high-court-312493

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan stated that when the power under section 254(2) is akin to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/income-tax-s-2542-is-akin-to-order-47-rule-1-cpc-rectification-limited-to-apparent-errors-madras-high-court-312493

[08/12, 13:47] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/income-tax-s-2542-is-akin-to-order-47-rule-1-cpc-rectification-limited-to-apparent-errors-madras-high-court-312493 [08/12, 13:47] Sekarreporter: The Madras High Court has held that the rectification power under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act is akin to the review power under Order 47...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version