SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

வா வாத்தியார் படம் திரையிட தடையில்லை

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

வா வாத்தியார் படம் திரையிட தடையில்லை

[10/12, 11:22] Sekarreporter: [10/12, 11:22] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1998631754723373227?t=vO9tgRZTurQfJZVj6stlqQ&s=08 [10/12, 11:22] Sekarreporter: [10/12, 11:20] Sekarreporter: Va vathiyar case Notice to the respondents adv vijayan subramaniyan seeks time to file a counter. Case adjourned to next week....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Father Can Be Ordered To Pay Maintenance To Unmarried Major Daughter U/s. 20 Of HAMA In Petition U/s. 125 CrPC: Delhi High Court

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

Father Can Be Ordered To Pay Maintenance To Unmarried Major Daughter U/s. 20 Of HAMA In Petition U/s. 125 CrPC: Delhi High Court

Father Can Be Ordered To Pay Maintenance To Unmarried Major Daughter U/s. 20 Of HAMA In Petition U/s. 125 CrPC: Delhi High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/delhi-high-court/shri-arun-kumar-v-smt-sarla-anr-2025dhc10936-unmarried-daughter-can-seek-maintenance-from-father-1600665 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

[10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 01/CJ+GAMJ/1 CMA/3642/2025 KARTI P.CHIDAMBARAM VS THE JOINT DIRECTOR M/S. C.UMA N.R.R.ARUN NATARAJAN —————— Chennai [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 7 WP/47232/2025 (PIL) TRAFFIC RAMASWAMY FOUNDATION VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FIANNCE DEPARTMENT AND 10 OTHERS. M/S.K.INDUMATHY VENKATESH S.KAROLIN GEETHA M. KAVITHA —————— Chennai [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 9 WP/47276/2025 (Election) SP.AADITHYA CHOLAN VS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND 2 OTHERS. M/S. S.ARIVAZHAGAN IMAYA THAMIZHAN M.SIVAKUMAR HARIPRAKASH RHEVANTH CHARAN —————— Chennai [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 13 WP/47410/2025 (PIL) N.RAJASEKARAN VS THE STATE OF TAMILNADU, AND 5 OTHERS. —————— Chennai [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 25 WP/43258/2025 (PIL) A.HARI NADAR VS THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND 2 OTHERS. M/S.WILLIAM SHAKESPHERE M.DILIP KUMAR —————— M/S.R.SELVA KUMAR, P.SHAGANI, J.MAHIBEN SAMUEL, C.JYOTHI FOR R3 DT.18/11/2025 M/S.S.SARAVANAN, D.UDHAYA SURIYAN, JAISURYA.R, S.ARUN FOR R2 DT.18/11/2025 [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 04/SMSJ+CKJ/18 EP/137/2025 THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE VS S.ARJUNLAL SUNDERDAS (DECEASED), 1. STUDIO GREEN, K.E.GNANAVEL RAJA, M/S. A.JANANI V.CHANDRASEKAR-MS/751/1980 K.P.MURALIDHARAN-MS/645/2000 A.JANANI-MS/1527/2014 —————— M/S. M.ARUN -MS/2741/2012 FOR JD D.NO.46207 FILED ON 08.12.2025 VAKALAT RETURNED ON 08.12.2025 [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: FOR PRONOUNCING ORDERS 11/MDIJ/1 WP/22968/2025 (Gen. Misc.) PVR INOX LIMITED VS AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS. ARVA MERCHANT SAHIL NARANG THRIYAMBAK.J.KANNAN ADITYA MUKERJEE AYUSHMAN KACKER AMOOLYA VINJAMUR VIDUSHA SINHA [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 38/NAVJ/23 Interim injunction OA/997/2025 EROS INTERNATIONAL MEDIA LIMITED VS 14 REELS ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED MS.VAIBHAV R VENKATESH ANIRUDH A SRIRAM AKASH SRINANDA V THRIVIKRAMA DAS K UKKASH F AJITH KIDAMBI —————— MR.KEERTHIKIRAN MURALI(1870/2013) ASHWIN SHANBHAG(281/2016) A.SELLA VISALAKSHI(2427/2016) YOGAMURUGAN.C(5814/2023) NANDHINI RAMALINGAM(586/2021) KARTHIK.V(3990/2025) TAMIL ARASAN.N(6125/2025) [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 2.15pm.. 38/NAVJ/50 CONT P/3130/2025 LATHA RAJINIKANTH VS KALAISELVI MOHAN, IAS M/S. J.RAM, R.HARIKRISHNAN, H.INDIRA, H.SATHISHKRISHNAN —————— MR.G.JAYAPRAKASH,GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 41/PDBJ/19 A/2426/2025 POLLACHI V.JAYARAMAN VS NAKKHEERAN GOPAL AND 10 OTHERS M/S. B. ARVIND SREVATSA —————— AND A 4554/2025 Direction NAKKHEERAN GOPAL VS POLLACHI V.JAYARAMAN AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER. M/S.P.T.PERUMAL V.VARGEES AMAL RAJA M.NAVEEN KUMAR

[10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 01/CJ+GAMJ/1 CMA/3642/2025 KARTI P.CHIDAMBARAM VS THE JOINT DIRECTOR M/S. C.UMA N.R.R.ARUN NATARAJAN —————— Chennai [10/12, 09:59] Sekarreporter: 7 WP/47232/2025 (PIL) TRAFFIC RAMASWAMY FOUNDATION VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FIANNCE DEPARTMENT AND 10...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

Justice V. Lakshminarayanan grant [10/12, 08:23] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has permitted the Tiruppur Corporation to establish a temporary waste storage site at Iduvai village. This decision comes after the court expressed dismay over the Corporation’s practice

[10/12, 08:23] Sekarreporter: [10/12, 08:23] Sekarreporter: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-high-court-permits-tiruppur-corporation-to-establish-temporary-waste-storage-site-at-iduvai/article70377342.ece [10/12, 08:23] Sekarreporter: The Hindu Logo Home News India Tamil Nadu Madras High Court permits Tiruppur Corporation to establish temporary waste storage site at Iduvai Justice V....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

Judge Dandabani The Madras High Court has allowed PVR INOX to continue operating its multiplex at Chennai Airport’s Aerohub until the Ministry of Civil Aviation makes a policy decision on allowing cinema halls in airports.

[10/12, 08:17] Meta AI: சென்னை விமான நிலையத்தில் உள்ள ஏரோஹப் பகுதியில் செயல்படும் PVR INOX திரையரங்கத்தை மூடுவதற்கு விதிக்கப்பட்ட தடை உத்தரவை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீட்டித்துள்ளது. விமான நிலையங்களில் திரையரங்குகள் செயல்படலாமா என்பது குறித்து மத்திய விமானப் போக்குவரத்து அமைச்சகம் கொள்கை முடிவு எடுக்கும்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

Bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan ruled that the appropriate remedy for a party aggrieved by such termination is to first file an application for recall before the Arbitral Tribunal, and if rejected, to approach the Court under Section 14(2) of the Act. The Bench explicitly barred the filing of fresh applications under Section 11 to initiate a second round of arbitration.

” VIP MEMBER LOGIN HomeJudgements JUDGEMENTS No Fresh Section 11 Petition Against Termination of Arbitral Proceedings; Remedy Lies in Recall Application or Section 14(2): SC ₹ 33. 34 By Law Trend December 9, 2025...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras HC criticises conduct of retired judge arbitrator over 7 year delay in passing award (Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs NCC Limited) – https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-criticises-conduct-of-retired-judge-arbitrator-over-7-year-delay-in-passing-award

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 10, 2025

Madras HC criticises conduct of retired judge arbitrator over 7 year delay in passing award (Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs NCC Limited) – https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-criticises-conduct-of-retired-judge-arbitrator-over-7-year-delay-in-passing-award

Madras HC criticises conduct of retired judge arbitrator over 7 year delay in passing award (Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs NCC Limited) – https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-criticises-conduct-of-retired-judge-arbitrator-over-7-year-delay-in-passing-award

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version