SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting aside an assessment order. The court held that notifications issued

Uncategorized

https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting aside an assessment order. The court held that notifications issued

[14/01, 09:11] Sekarreporter: [14/01, 09:11] Sekarreporter: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-notifications-extending-limitation-us-168a-stand-vitiated-and-illegal-madras-hc-sets-aside-assessment-order-1441826 [14/01, 09:11] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that GST notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act are vitiated and illegal, setting...

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The petitioner argued that the government order violates the HR&CE Act, which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties. They’re seeking to quash the order and have the cottages returned to temple trustees or fit persons.

[14/01, 09:08] Sekarreporter: “Stating that the GO is in violation of the HR&CE Act which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties, he requested the court to quash the order and retransfer the cottages to...

Uncategorized

Justice G R Swaminathan passed the order on a petition filed by S Vijaynarayanan, manager of a religious mutt in Chennai, who argued that the transfer would commercialize temple properties and deprive pilgrims of affordable lodging. The petitioner had stayed at ‘Hotel Alayam’ in Tiruchendur’s Subramaniya Swamy temple, unaware it was a Yatri Nivas meant for pilgrims. The court noted the government’s move could erode the temple’s charitable identity and politicize its administration. ¹ ²

[14/01, 09:03] Sekarreporter: “Justice G R Swaminathan passed the order on a petition filed by S Vijaynarayanan, manager of a religious mutt in Chennai, who sought to quash the April 26, 2024 GO issued...

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has criticized the CB-CID for failing to arrest S Krishnakumari, a suspended sub-inspector and mother of the accused,

[14/01, 09:01] Sekarreporter: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/caste-killing-of-techie-hc-criticises-cb-cid-for-failure-to-arrest-accused/article70506050.ece [14/01, 09:01] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has criticized the CB-CID for failing to arrest S Krishnakumari, a suspended sub-inspector and mother of the accused, in the Kavin Selvaganesh...

Uncategorized

Justice L Victoria Gowri dismissed Krishnakumari’s petition seeking direction to the trial court to hear her application to recall the non-bailable warrant issued against her. The court emphasized the need for transparency and rigour in investigation, particularly in grave offences with SC/ST Act implications.

[14/01, 08:53] Sekarreporter: ” NATION WORLD STATES OPINION CITIES BUSINESS SPORT GOOD NEWS MOVIES LIFESTYLE VIDEOS WEB SCRAWL Advertisement Tamil Nadu Madras HC faults CB-CID for not arresting SI-mom in Kavin murder case In...

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs https://www.sekarreporter.com/meta-ai-the-madras-high-court-has-upheld-the-cestats-rejection-of-a-limitation-plea-raised-by-modern-engineering-plastics-pvt-ltd-mepp-under-section-11a-of-the-central-excise-act-the-appellant/

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs https://www.sekarreporter.com/meta-ai-the-madras-high-court-has-upheld-the-cestats-rejection-of-a-limitation-plea-raised-by-modern-engineering-plastics-pvt-ltd-mepp-under-section-11a-of-the-central-excise-act-the-appellant/

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant,...

Uncategorized

Justice P T Asha emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that the delay in decision-making could have irreversible consequences. The court has asked the authorities to consider the request positively and take a decision as soon as an organ becomes available. ¹

[14/01, 08:04] Sekarreporter: https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/madras-high-court-directs-authorities-to-decide-dual-lung-allocation-for-critically-ill-patient-in-3-days-10470194/ [14/01, 08:04] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has directed the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) and the Transplant Authority Government of Tamil Nadu (TRANSTAN) to decide on...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com