The plaintiff is only making an attempt to shut the voice of the individuals or the social media who are airing their views which are against him. Therefore, the claim made by the plaintiff is hereby rejected. Consequently, the prayer sought as against the second defendant for a blanket direction to remove the videos, photographs, Whatsapp chats, Instagram posts and debates on the issues between the plaintiff and the first defendant cannot be granted. As the plaintiff has not prima facie established his case as against the defendants 1 and 2 and as the balance of convenience and irreparable injury are in favour of the 1st defendant, both the interim prayers are rejected. 49. In view of the above discussions, both the applications are dismissed. No costs. Post the Suit in the usual course. 07.01.2026 Asr Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. Asr O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of 2025 Dated : 07.01.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON 10.11.2025 PRONOUNCED ON 07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of...
