SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Transfer Of Shares Under Impermissible Arrangement Bars DTAA Capital Gains Exemption: Supreme Court Declines Relief To Tiger Global In Walmart–Flipkart Transaction  https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-ii-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604675

Transfer Of Shares Under Impermissible Arrangement Bars DTAA Capital Gains Exemption: Supreme Court Declines Relief To Tiger Global In Walmart–Flipkart Transaction https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-ii-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604675

Transfer Of Shares Under Impermissible Arrangement Bars DTAA Capital Gains Exemption: Supreme Court Declines Relief To Tiger Global In Walmart–Flipkart Transaction https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-ii-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604675 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Jayachandran and Justice K K Ramakrishnan observed that investigation is presently being conducted by deputy superintendent of police, CB-CID, Madurai range. Hence, the court was not inclined to make any observation on the merits of the case. It was open to the investigating officer to examine and investigate all angles and first rule out whether it was a custodial death or an accidental death.”

[17/01, 18:00] Sekarreporter: “Jayachandran and Justice K K Ramakrishnan observed that investigation is presently being conducted by deputy superintendent of police, CB-CID, Madurai range. Hence, the court was not inclined to make any observation...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan in follow-up to its March 24, 2025, order wherein the Court constituted a National Task Force (NTF) address mental health concerns of students and to prevent the rising suicides in higher educational institutions. Its mandate is to investigate and prevent the increasing

The Supreme Court recently said that it is deeply saddened and disturbed to acknowledge the increasing number of unfortunate incidents of suicides in higher educational institutions(HEIs) across the country. To prevent such incidents, it has issued...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Madras High Court – FCRA Ruling (Core Meaning) The Madras High Court ruled that teaching or promoting the Bhagavad Gita, Vedanta, and Yoga does not constitute “religious activity” under Indian law, and therefore cannot be used as a ground to deny or cancel foreign funding under the FCRA (Foreign Contribution Regulation Act).

Madras High Court – FCRA Ruling (Core Meaning) The Madras High Court ruled that teaching or promoting the Bhagavad Gita, Vedanta, and Yoga does not constitute “religious activity” under Indian law, and therefore cannot...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
India Must Preserve Tax Sovereignty While Entering International Treaties: Supreme Court Proposes Safeguards  https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604652

India Must Preserve Tax Sovereignty While Entering International Treaties: Supreme Court Proposes Safeguards https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604652

[17/01, 11:02] Sekarreporter: India Must Preserve Tax Sovereignty While Entering International Treaties: Supreme Court Proposes Safeguards https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/the-authority-for-advance-rulings-income-tax-others-v-tiger-global-international-holdings-2026-insc-60-1604652 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The Supreme Court has ruled that an industrial dispute raised after 16 years doesn’t automatically entitle the worker to reinstatement and back wages. In the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Krishna Murari Sharma, the court replaced the reinstatement order with a lump sum compensation of ₹2.5 lakh, citing the gross delay in seeking reference under the Industrial Disputes Act.

[17/01, 09:13] Sekarreporter: Industrial Dispute Raised After 16 Years: Supreme Court Replaces Reinstatement With ₹2.5 Lakh Compensation https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/industrial-dispute-raised-after-16-years-supreme-court-replaces-reinstatement-with-25-lakh-compensation-1557050 [17/01, 09:13] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has ruled that an industrial dispute raised after 16...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version