SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Neet case age 17 years must to write neet exam –+-IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.09.2021 CORAM  THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY  W.A.Nos.1892 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.12087 of 2021 and W.P.No.16958 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.17966 of 2021–    For Appellant	:	Mr.G.Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel for Ms.Sunitakumari  For Respondents :	Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for M/s.AL.Gandhimathi for R1  Mr.R.P.Pragadish Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R2 Ms.Shubaranjani Ananth for R3 Mr.G.Nagarajan for R4 W.P.No.16958/2021 :

Neet case age 17 years must to write neet exam –+-IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.09.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.Nos.1892 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.12087 of 2021 and W.P.No.16958 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.17966 of 2021– For Appellant : Mr.G.Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel for Ms.Sunitakumari For Respondents : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for M/s.AL.Gandhimathi for R1 Mr.R.P.Pragadish Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R2 Ms.Shubaranjani Ananth for R3 Mr.G.Nagarajan for R4 W.P.No.16958/2021 :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.09.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.Nos.1892 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.12087 of 2021 and W.P.No.16958 of...

W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by  NKKJ and RPAJ] Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order passed by the First Respondent in DCC No. 126 of 2019 dated 27.03.2021 in

W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by NKKJ and RPAJ] Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order passed by the First Respondent in DCC No. 126 of 2019 dated 27.03.2021 in

W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by NKKJ and RPAJ] Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying...

Sekarreporter: W.P.(MD)No.7746 of 2020 & batch cases W.P.(MD)Nos.7746, 6308, 8659, 8373 of 2020  & 22506, 1628 & 5920 of 2019 & 18676, 3416,   25497, 25503, 21569, 2613, 2448 & 20163 of 2018  and W.M.P.(MD)No.3548 of 2018 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. These matters have been listed today for reporting compliance.

Sekarreporter: W.P.(MD)No.7746 of 2020 & batch cases W.P.(MD)Nos.7746, 6308, 8659, 8373 of 2020 & 22506, 1628 & 5920 of 2019 & 18676, 3416, 25497, 25503, 21569, 2613, 2448 & 20163 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3548 of 2018 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. These matters have been listed today for reporting compliance.

[9/7, 16:47] Sekarreporter: W.P.(MD)No.7746 of 2020 & batch cases W.P.(MD)Nos.7746, 6308, 8659, 8373 of 2020 & 22506, 1628 & 5920 of 2019 & 18676, 3416, 25497, 25503, 21569, 2613, 2448 & 20163 of 2018...

Gaurav kumar Advt: 21. It cannot be gainsaid that if an order/judgment of a ‘Tribunal’ is not pronounced at all, the same is a nullity in the ‘eye of law’, considering the fact that the ‘pronouncement’ is primarily a judicial act, which is the ‘Sanctum Sanctorum of any judicial proceedings’ in our ‘justice delivery system’, as opined by this ‘Tribunal’.  22. It is to be relevantly mentioned that ‘Pronouncement of Order’ is quite distinct from communicating/informing/intimating a

Gaurav kumar Advt: 21. It cannot be gainsaid that if an order/judgment of a ‘Tribunal’ is not pronounced at all, the same is a nullity in the ‘eye of law’, considering the fact that the ‘pronouncement’ is primarily a judicial act, which is the ‘Sanctum Sanctorum of any judicial proceedings’ in our ‘justice delivery system’, as opined by this ‘Tribunal’. 22. It is to be relevantly mentioned that ‘Pronouncement of Order’ is quite distinct from communicating/informing/intimating a

[9/7, 15:23] Gaurav kumar Advt: 21. It cannot be gainsaid that if an order/judgment of a ‘Tribunal’ is not pronounced at all, the same is a nullity in the ‘eye of law’, considering the...

இனிமேல் மது குடிக்க மாட்டோம் என்று சத்தியப்பிரமாண பத்திரம் தாக்கல் செய்தால் ஜாமின்.: ஐகோர்ட்

இனிமேல் மது குடிக்க மாட்டோம் என்று சத்தியப்பிரமாண பத்திரம் தாக்கல் செய்தால் ஜாமின்.: ஐகோர்ட்

இனிமேல் மது குடிக்க மாட்டோம் என்று சத்தியப்பிரமாண பத்திரம் தாக்கல் செய்தால் ஜாமின்.: ஐகோர்ட்

It is abhorring that school bags contain photos of politicians. Public funds cannot be misused in this way. Thankfully, incumbent CM @mkstalin has decided has decided against such practice and not to waste bags that already contain photos of former CMs: Madras HC

It is abhorring that school bags contain photos of politicians. Public funds cannot be misused in this way. Thankfully, incumbent CM @mkstalin has decided has decided against such practice and not to waste bags that already contain photos of former CMs: Madras HC

It is abhorring that school bags contain photos of politicians. Public funds cannot be misused in this way. Thankfully, incumbent CM @mkstalin has decided has decided against such practice and not to waste bags...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com