W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by NKKJ and RPAJ] Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order passed by the First Respondent in DCC No. 126 of 2019 dated 27.03.2021 in
-
W.P. No. 13796 of 2021
16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by
NKKJ and RPAJ]
Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order
passed by the First Respondent in DCC No. 126 of 2019 dated 27.03.2021 in
dismissing the complaint filed by the Petitioner and further be pleased to remand the
complaint of the Petitioner in DCC No.126 of 2019 before any other disciplinary
committee to consider the complaint afresh in the light of the evidences filed before
it.
For Petitioner : Mr. Karthik Ranganathan (Petitioner-in-Person)
For Respondents : Mr. C.K.Chandrasekkar (For R1)
Mr. Rajesh Vivekanandan (For R3 & R4)
ORDER
(Order of the Court was passed by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J)
The matter was heard through ”Video Conference”.
2. Whether the members of Parliament could travel to Delhi to attend
Parliament by spending their own money without sponsorship by the
Government?
3. No Member of Parliament would spend his own money to attend Parliament.
When such is the position, with regard to the elected members of Parliament, no one
2/24
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P. No. 13796 of 2021
These words are suffice to rethink the issue of making Justice affordable and
accessible, including geographically. Therefore, the Respondents may consider
constituting Circuit Benches/Permanent Benches of all Tribunals located in New
Delhi including Bar Council of India for each Zone for the benefit of common man,
at the earliest.
32. Considering the fact that India is having a population of 136 Crores, 34
Supreme Court Judges are not enough and more number of Judges are to be
appointed. Hence, this Court hopes and expects that justice would be rendered by all
the stake holders by taking a pragmatic, appropriate, justifiable and a fair decision in
the interest of the people. It is not the intention of this Court to cast aspersion on
anybody. The observations in this order are made with great respect to all the stake
holders especially the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Only based on the facts, the present
order has been passed and it may not be understood that this Court has passed this
order, exceeding its limits.
33. In fine, negativing the prayer sought for, the Writ Petition is disposed of with
the above observations. It is made clear that the petitioner is granted two weeks time
to file appeal if he so wishes, before the Bar Council of India. In the event of filing
21/24
http://www.judis.nic.in
