SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

A day after the resolution of the Full Court, the petitioner made an application for voluntary retirement, but could not be accepted by the then Chief Justice going against the resolution of the Full Court.  The Government, thereupon, issued order of compulsory retirement of the petitioner, which has been assailed herein.

Uncategorized

A day after the resolution of the Full Court, the petitioner made an application for voluntary retirement, but could not be accepted by the then Chief Justice going against the resolution of the Full Court.  The Government, thereupon, issued order of compulsory retirement of the petitioner, which has been assailed herein.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:    21.06.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No.8852 of 2022 A.Mohamed Jiyaputheen                      .. Petitioner Vs 1.State...

Mafras high court temple case order admk centempt case order june 29

Uncategorized

Mafras high court temple case order admk centempt case order june 29

[6/28, 12:29] Sekarreporter: மத்திய அரசின் வேளாண் திருத்த சட்டத்திற்கு எதிராக போராட்டம் நடத்தியதாக சிபிஎம் மாநிலச் செயலாளர் கே பாலகிருஷ்ணன் சிபிஐ மாநிலச் செயலாளர் முத்தரசன் விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சித் தலைவர் திருமாவளவன் ஆகியோர் மீதான குற்றப்பத்திரிகையை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது .....

சிறைக்குள் செல்போன் வைத்திருந்ததாக ராஜிவ் கொலை வழக்கு ஆயுள் கைதி முருகனுக்கு எதிரான வழக்கு ரத்து…. Judge sathis kumar

Uncategorized

சிறைக்குள் செல்போன் வைத்திருந்ததாக ராஜிவ் கொலை வழக்கு ஆயுள் கைதி முருகனுக்கு எதிரான வழக்கு ரத்து…. Judge sathis kumar

சிறைக்குள் செல்போன் வைத்திருந்ததாக ராஜிவ் கொலை வழக்கு ஆயுள் கைதி முருகனுக்கு எதிரான வழக்கு ரத்து…. முருகன் தாக்கல் செய்த மனு மீது சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு… செல்போன் வைத்திருந்தது தொடர்பாக வேலூர் சிறை கண்காணிப்பாளர் அளித்த புகாரில் பாகாயம் காவல் நிலையத்தில் வழக்குப்பதிவு… சிறை...

learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.   In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 30.07.2021 RR M.DHANDAPANI,J. RR Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 30.07.2021

Uncategorized

learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.   In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 30.07.2021 RR M.DHANDAPANI,J. RR Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 30.07.2021

  Crl.O.P.No.12546 of 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 323, 347, 384 and 420 IPC in Crime No.4...

Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012 M.Shanmugam, 1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam, Ayyampalayam Road, KNP Colony Post, Veerapandi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Vs All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam, Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The General Council of the Central Organisation, All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator, Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The Central Executive Committee,

Uncategorized

Admk contempt copy THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012 M.Shanmugam, 1268D, Solvalakshmi Nagar, K Chettipalayam, Ayyampalayam Road, KNP Colony Post, Veerapandi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu – 641 605                        ….PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Vs All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam, Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The General Council of the Central Organisation, All India Anna DravidaMunnetraKazhagam Rep. by its Co-Ordinator and Joint Co-Ordinator, Thiru.O.Panneerselvam and Thiru.E.Palaniswamy, having office at No.226/275, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. The Central Executive Committee,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (APPELLATE SIDE)   CONT.P. No.                        of 2022 In C.M.P.No.     of 2022 In O.S.A.No.                  of 2022 In   O.A.No.328 of 2022 In C.S.No.111 of 2012  ...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai   for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                  For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan  for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                  For R3                : No appearance    (R2-died & R4-given up)  JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / I am not persuaded by the contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents drew my attention —Appellants       : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai   for Mr.P.Adhimoola Pandian                                  For R1                      : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan  for Mr.M.Jothibasu                                  For R3                : No appearance    (R2-died & R4-given up)  JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 02.011.2021 PRONOUNCED ON: 26.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007 Thulasiammal (died)                       … Appellant  / 1st Respondent / Plaintiff Senthamarai Venkatesh...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com