SEKAR REPORTER Blog

After recording the submissions made by the respective counsels, a  direction is issued to the fourth respondent to complete the enquiry as against the fifth respondent for the alleged violation of the Pre-Conception, Pre-Natal Diagnostics Techniques Act and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

After recording the submissions made by the respective counsels, a direction is issued to the fourth respondent to complete the enquiry as against the fifth respondent for the alleged violation of the Pre-Conception, Pre-Natal Diagnostics Techniques Act and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.07.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.17503 of 2022 S.Ameen … Petitioner Versus 1. The Tamil Nadu Medical Council 914, Poonamallee High Road,...

Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed by setting aside the order impugned in the writ petition as well as in this appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.M.D., J.)       (J.S.N.P., J.       Appellant 	:   	Mr.Nithyesh and Vaibhav For Mr.Palani Selvaraj For Respondents	:   	Mr. A.P. Srinivas Senior Panel Counsel (Income Tax) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J.   )

Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed by setting aside the order impugned in the writ petition as well as in this appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J. Appellant : Mr.Nithyesh and Vaibhav For Mr.Palani Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr. A.P. Srinivas Senior Panel Counsel (Income Tax) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J. )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 2406 of 2021 — M/s. Lion...

JUdge krishnan ramasamy senior psr and sathis நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் 1999ம் ஆண்டு எழுதி வைத்ததாக கூறப்படும் உயில் ஜோடிக்கப்பட்டது என அவரது மகள்கள் தரப்பில் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் வாதிடப்பட்டது

JUdge krishnan ramasamy senior psr and sathis நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் 1999ம் ஆண்டு எழுதி வைத்ததாக கூறப்படும் உயில் ஜோடிக்கப்பட்டது என அவரது மகள்கள் தரப்பில் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் வாதிடப்பட்டது

நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் 1999ம் ஆண்டு எழுதி வைத்ததாக கூறப்படும் உயில் ஜோடிக்கப்பட்டது என அவரது மகள்கள் தரப்பில் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் வாதிடப்பட்டது. நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் மரணத்துக்குப் பின், அவருக்கு சொந்தமான 270 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்துக்களை முறையாக நிர்வகிக்கவில்லை எனவும், வீடுகளின் வாடகை...

ஆருர்தா bail granted Crl.O.P.Nos.13061, 13568, 13626, 13928, 15409, 15935, 15938, 15941, 16018 & 16037 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. In pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court dated  23.06.2022, 04.07.2022, 11.07.2022 & 13.07.2022, the Competent Authority filed status report dated 18.07.2022 before this Court. 2.	The learned Additional Public Prosecutor தாமோதரன்  appearing for the respondent police submitted that the accused persons did not appear before the Competent

ஆருர்தா bail granted Crl.O.P.Nos.13061, 13568, 13626, 13928, 15409, 15935, 15938, 15941, 16018 & 16037 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. In pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court dated 23.06.2022, 04.07.2022, 11.07.2022 & 13.07.2022, the Competent Authority filed status report dated 18.07.2022 before this Court. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor தாமோதரன் appearing for the respondent police submitted that the accused persons did not appear before the Competent

Crl.O.P.Nos.13061, 13568, 13626, 13928, 15409, 15935, 15938, 15941, 16018 & 16037 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. In pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court dated 23.06.2022, 04.07.2022, 11.07.2022 & 13.07.2022, the Competent Authority...

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The impugned order granting bail is set aside.  It is however made clear that any observation made in this order will not affect the merits of the trial. ………………………………………………………,J. (INDIRA BANERJEE) ………………………………………………………,J. (V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN) NEW DELHI;

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The impugned order granting bail is set aside. It is however made clear that any observation made in this order will not affect the merits of the trial. ………………………………………………………,J. (INDIRA BANERJEE) ………………………………………………………,J. (V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN) NEW DELHI;

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4982 of 2022) INDRESH KUMAR … Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR...

W.P.No.18455 of 2022 and    W.M.P.No.17800 of 2022 N.SATHISH KUMAR,J. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.25 of 2022 pending on the file of the fourth respondent to CBCID, Villupuram and also seeking repostmortem of the body of the girl, who studied in the Sakthi Matriculation school at Kallakurichi.

W.P.No.18455 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.17800 of 2022 N.SATHISH KUMAR,J. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.25 of 2022 pending on the file of the fourth respondent to CBCID, Villupuram and also seeking repostmortem of the body of the girl, who studied in the Sakthi Matriculation school at Kallakurichi.

W.P.No.18455 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.17800 of 2022 N.SATHISH KUMAR,J. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.25 of 2022 pending on...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com