SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Full order of admk lock and seal case HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and 3. Crl.O.P.No.16695 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9799 and 9800 of 2022 Crl.O.P.Nos.16343 and 16695 of 2022 Edappadi K. Palaniswamy M/a 67 years Interim General Secretary & Party Headquarters Secretary, All India Anna Dravita Munnetra Kazatam Puratchi Thalaivar MGR Maaligai 226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600014. .. Petitioner ~Vs~ 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cumfull

Uncategorized

Full order of admk lock and seal case HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and 3. Crl.O.P.No.16695 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9799 and 9800 of 2022 Crl.O.P.Nos.16343 and 16695 of 2022 Edappadi K. Palaniswamy M/a 67 years Interim General Secretary & Party Headquarters Secretary, All India Anna Dravita Munnetra Kazatam Puratchi Thalaivar MGR Maaligai 226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600014. .. Petitioner ~Vs~ 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cumfull

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Delivered on 15~07~2022 20~07~2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and...

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the. //// The Advocate Commissioner and the appropriate Forensic Expert shall complete the exercise and submit a report within a period of three months there from; (vii) Upon receipt of the report, the learned Magistrate shall forward the same to this Court accordingly. 9. Call the main appeal after the receipt of the report from the Trial Court. 19.07.2022 grs  D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

Uncategorized

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the. //// The Advocate Commissioner and the appropriate Forensic Expert shall complete the exercise and submit a report within a period of three months there from; (vii) Upon receipt of the report, the learned Magistrate shall forward the same to this Court accordingly. 9. Call the main appeal after the receipt of the report from the Trial Court. 19.07.2022 grs  D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the petitioner/complainant. The complaint is alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

The appellant’s husband, namely Venkatesan, shall also execute a bond standing as surety ensuring the compliance of the above mentioned undertaking by the appellant; 9. The Criminal Appeal is partly allowed accordingly. 14.07.2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JHON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, For Appellant : Mr.R.Jothi for Mr.P.Rathanavel For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

The appellant’s husband, namely Venkatesan, shall also execute a bond standing as surety ensuring the compliance of the above mentioned undertaking by the appellant; 9. The Criminal Appeal is partly allowed accordingly. 14.07.2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JHON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, For Appellant : Mr.R.Jothi for Mr.P.Rathanavel For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ponnai Circle,...

Actor sivaji sons senior adv p r raman arguments

Uncategorized

Actor sivaji sons senior adv p r raman arguments

நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் எழுதி வைத்த உயில் ஜோடிக்கப்பட்டது என்ற குற்றச்சாட்டு தவறானது என பாகப்பிரிவினை கோரிய வழக்கில் நடிகர்கள் ராம்குமார், பிரபு தரப்பில் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வாதம் முன்வைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் மரணத்துக்குப் பின், அவருக்கு சொந்தமான 270 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்துக்களை முறையாக...

15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.

Uncategorized

15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.06.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition Nos. 34308 & 34309 of 2004...

16.Accordingly, the order of the learned Judge dated 29.04.2011 passed in the writ petitions is set aside and these appeals are allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 30.06.2022. HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016 and CMP.Nos.10731 to 10738 of 2016 WA No. 823 of 2016 1. Director General of Foreign Trade Government of India f 2001. For Appellants : Mr. Sankara Narayanan, ASGI assisted by Mr.Venkatasamy Babu in all the writ appeals For R1 : Mr.A.Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan in all the writ appeals COMMON JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

Uncategorized

16.Accordingly, the order of the learned Judge dated 29.04.2011 passed in the writ petitions is set aside and these appeals are allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 30.06.2022. HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016 and CMP.Nos.10731 to 10738 of 2016 WA No. 823 of 2016 1. Director General of Foreign Trade Government of India f 2001. For Appellants : Mr. Sankara Narayanan, ASGI assisted by Mr.Venkatasamy Babu in all the writ appeals For R1 : Mr.A.Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan in all the writ appeals COMMON JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016...

யூ டியூபர் சவுக்கு சங்கர் மீது நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் தாமாக முன் வந்து நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கு பதிவு செய்ய மதுரை கிளை பதிவாளருக்கு உத்தரவு. உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை கிளை நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் பற்றி சவுக்கு சங்கர் அவதூறாக டுவிட் செய்துள்ளார் என்பது குற்றச்சாட்டு.

Uncategorized

யூ டியூபர் சவுக்கு சங்கர் மீது நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் தாமாக முன் வந்து நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கு பதிவு செய்ய மதுரை கிளை பதிவாளருக்கு உத்தரவு. உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை கிளை நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் பற்றி சவுக்கு சங்கர் அவதூறாக டுவிட் செய்துள்ளார் என்பது குற்றச்சாட்டு.

யூ டியூபர் சவுக்கு சங்கர் மீது நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் தாமாக முன் வந்து நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கு பதிவு செய்ய மதுரை கிளை பதிவாளருக்கு உத்தரவு. உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை கிளை நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர் சுவாமிநாதன் பற்றி சவுக்கு சங்கர் அவதூறாக டுவிட் செய்துள்ளார் என்பது...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com