SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Idol case and encouragement case rti case news

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 24, 2022

Idol case and encouragement case rti case news

[7/23, 12:13] Sekarreporter1: காஞ்சிபுரம் ஏகாம்பரநாதர் கோவிலுக்கு சோம ஸ்கந்தர் சிலை செய்ததில் நடந்த முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கின் விசாரணையை, சிலை கடத்தல் தடுப்பு பிரிவிலிருந்து சிவகாஞ்சி போலீசாருக்கு மாற்றி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. காஞ்சிபுரம் ஏகாம்பரநாதர் கோவிலில் உள்ள ஆயிரம் ஆண்டுகள் பழமையான சோமாஸ்கந்தர் சிலையில்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
directing the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same at the earliest, so that if any encroachment is found, necessary action may be taken, and if the result of the inquiry shows no encroachment, then respondents 2 and 3 can maintain the construction. In the proceeding, if the petitioner wishes, he can also participate, and the District Collector is directed to give such permission. There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.). Gp muthukumar

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 23, 2022

directing the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same at the earliest, so that if any encroachment is found, necessary action may be taken, and if the result of the inquiry shows no encroachment, then respondents 2 and 3 can maintain the construction. In the proceeding, if the petitioner wishes, he can also participate, and the District Collector is directed to give such permission. There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.). Gp muthukumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.Nos.18470, 18474, 18477, 18480 of 2022 A.Ezhumalai .. Petitioner vs...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.21018 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015 Mr.P.Adhavan Seral .In view of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the decision taken by the respondents in denying the issuance of the copy of the certificates of the candidates, who have registered themselves under the “Inter-Caste Marriage” category. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.Niranjan Ragagopalan for R1 Mr.C.Sathish Government Advocate for R2 and R3 ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 23, 2022

JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.21018 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015 Mr.P.Adhavan Seral .In view of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the decision taken by the respondents in denying the issuance of the copy of the certificates of the candidates, who have registered themselves under the “Inter-Caste Marriage” category. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.Niranjan Ragagopalan for R1 Mr.C.Sathish Government Advocate for R2 and R3 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ORDERS RESERVED ON : 14.07.2022 PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON : 18.07.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.21018 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015 Mr.P.Adhavan Seral ..Petitioner...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.Nos.28016 of 2017, 6069 of 2019, 22792 & 22793 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.Nos.15938 & 15939 of 2017, 3385, 11887, 11889 of 2019 Crl.O.P.No.28016 of 2017 The re-investigation of the case shall be completed within a period of 90 days, from the date of receipt of the order, and final report shall be filed before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Kanchipuram, who ordered the investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.P.L.Narayanan For R1 : Mr.R.Muniapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 Crl.O.P.No.6069 of 2019

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 23, 2022

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.Nos.28016 of 2017, 6069 of 2019, 22792 & 22793 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.Nos.15938 & 15939 of 2017, 3385, 11887, 11889 of 2019 Crl.O.P.No.28016 of 2017 The re-investigation of the case shall be completed within a period of 90 days, from the date of receipt of the order, and final report shall be filed before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Kanchipuram, who ordered the investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.P.L.Narayanan For R1 : Mr.R.Muniapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 Crl.O.P.No.6069 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 13.07.2022 Pronounced on : 22.07.2022 Coram:: THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.Nos.28016 of 2017, 6069 of 2019, 22792 & 22793 of 2019 &...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.642 of 2018 Siva vs. n view of the above, the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Vellore made in S.C.No.90 of 2017 dated 11.9.2018 is set aside and the appellant is acquitted of all the charges. The appellant is set at liberty. Bail bond executed, if any, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount paid, if any, shall be refunded to the appellant. (S.V.N.,J.) (A.D.J.C.,J.) 22.7.2022.add pp babu muthu meeran vehumently opposed

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 23, 2022

MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.642 of 2018 Siva vs. n view of the above, the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Vellore made in S.C.No.90 of 2017 dated 11.9.2018 is set aside and the appellant is acquitted of all the charges. The appellant is set at liberty. Bail bond executed, if any, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount paid, if any, shall be refunded to the appellant. (S.V.N.,J.) (A.D.J.C.,J.) 22.7.2022.add pp babu muthu meeran vehumently opposed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 12.7.2022 Delivered on : 22.7.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.642 of 2018 Siva vs....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
In the result, this Writ Petition is allowed and there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.5 Lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the petitioner within a period of six weeks judge Anath venkadesh. For Petitioner : Ms.Poongkhulali for Mrs.D.Geetha For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.N.Damodaran for R3 ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published July 23, 2022

In the result, this Writ Petition is allowed and there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.5 Lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the petitioner within a period of six weeks judge Anath venkadesh. For Petitioner : Ms.Poongkhulali for Mrs.D.Geetha For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.N.Damodaran for R3 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ORDERS RESERVED ON : 20.07.2022 PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON : 22.07.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.26460 of 2007 S.Bhanupriya ..Petitioner .Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version