SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport Corporations, Retired Employees Welfare Association. For Petitioner        :  Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan  Senior Counsel  for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents   :  Mr.R.Ramanlal  Additional Advocate General  assisted by Mr.C.Selvaraj  Government Advocate ORDER directed to pay the enhanced Dearness Allowance to the State Government Transport Retired Employees ,

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport Corporations, Retired Employees Welfare Association. For Petitioner        :  Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan  Senior Counsel  for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents   :  Mr.R.Ramanlal  Additional Advocate General  assisted by Mr.C.Selvaraj  Government Advocate ORDER directed to pay the enhanced Dearness Allowance to the State Government Transport Retired Employees ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhere. For Petitioners          :  Mr.T.Shanmugarajeswaran                                  For Respondent        :  Mr.S.Santhosh    Government Advocate (Crl.side)  ORDER

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhere. For Petitioners          :  Mr.T.Shanmugarajeswaran                                  For Respondent        :  Mr.S.Santhosh    Government Advocate (Crl.side)  ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  08.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 1.S.Prakash 2.Meenakshi Ammal 3.P.Karpagavalli 4.Kumaresan                                    …Petitioners Vs. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,...

Caae against k n neru quashed. THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by.       For Petitioner            : Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,             Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in ,

Uncategorized

Caae against k n neru quashed. THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by.       For Petitioner            : Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,             Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 06.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by, The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore...

Madras high court sep 10 th orders news click the link and read

Uncategorized

Madras high court sep 10 th orders news click the link and read

[9/9, 11:19] Sekarreporter1: தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரிகள் 50 சதவீத மாணவர்களிடம் அரசு மருத்துவக் கல்லூரி கட்டணத்தையே வசூலிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற உத்தரவை மறு ஆய்வு செய்ய வேண்டும்… தேசிய மருத்துவ ஆணையத்துக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு… கட்டணம் உத்தரவை மறு ஆய்வு செய்யும் நடைமுறை...

Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar book release function sunday pnpj Vpj. Grsj. .To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders.

Uncategorized

Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar book release function sunday pnpj Vpj. Grsj. .To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders.

Bharathi 101   Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar.To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders....

[9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under NMC fee fixation only. With respect to the Office Memorandum, the Court has held that directing fees for 50% of seats to be fixed equivalent to govt college fees will result in cross subsidy which is barred by the Supreme Court. The court has further held that the same will also result in seats going vacant due to high fees. Therefore, the Court has directed the NMC to reconsider and issue a fresh Office Memorandum in light of the judgment. Till then, the court has directed that existing fee fixation practise will continue. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Mr. Vijaynarayan, PS Raman and ArL Sundaresan appeared for petitioners. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Learned ASG appeared for respondents.

Uncategorized

[9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under NMC fee fixation only. With respect to the Office Memorandum, the Court has held that directing fees for 50% of seats to be fixed equivalent to govt college fees will result in cross subsidy which is barred by the Supreme Court. The court has further held that the same will also result in seats going vacant due to high fees. Therefore, the Court has directed the NMC to reconsider and issue a fresh Office Memorandum in light of the judgment. Till then, the court has directed that existing fee fixation practise will continue. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Mr. Vijaynarayan, PS Raman and ArL Sundaresan appeared for petitioners. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Learned ASG appeared for respondents.

    [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under...

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv https://www.sekarreporter.com/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/

Uncategorized

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv https://www.sekarreporter.com/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com