SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some other judge. Says, it’s a very cheap practice which scandalises the judiciary and undermines it’s authority @THChennai

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 4, 2022

8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some other judge. Says, it’s a very cheap practice which scandalises the judiciary and undermines it’s authority @THChennai

[8/4, 15:27] Sekarreporter1: [8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 4, 2022

https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1555111404977262592?t=mkHW0X9_l4Mkon51Pt7ZBg&s=08 [8/4, 14:11] Sekarreporter1: Madras High Court grants injunction restraining a blogger from broadcasting a video defaming the brand Thalappakatti. Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for Thalappakatti brand. The court held that on viewing the video, the said video prima facie appears to tarnish the reputation of the Trademark Thalappakatti and the same cannot be considered as fair comment. Thalappakatti has also sought damages for 25 Lakhs.

[8/4, 13:41] Sekarreporter1: O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory.  He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 4, 2022

O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory.  He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.

I O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J In a suit for alleged trademark infringement, the plaintiff has presented four Original Applications. Learned counsel for the plaintiff asserts that...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Chief justice ordered in contempt case

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 4, 2022

Chief justice ordered in contempt case

ஆக்கிரமிப்பை அகற்ற நீதிமன்றம் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்தாத கலசப்பாக்கம் தாலுகாவின் அப்போதைய பெண் தாசில்தாரை நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கில் குற்றவாளி என அறிவித்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பளித்துள்ளது. தண்டனை விவரங்களை அறிவிப்பதற்காக ஆகஸ்ட் 5ம் தேதி அவரை நேரில் ஆஜராகவும் தலைமை நீதிபதி அமர்வு உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 3, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order Reserved On:  08.04.2022 Order Delivered On:   .07.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version