SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala   for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala   for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.Additional Director General of Police,    Economic Offences Wing,    Anna Nagar, Chennai...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar to cause a survey of the land in question, as requested by the HR & CE Department, and send the report at the earliest, in any case not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.  In case any encroachment is reported, the HR & CE Department would proceed to remove the encroachment by taking the process, as provided under the provisions of HR & CE Act, 1959.  There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                              

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar to cause a survey of the land in question, as requested by the HR & CE Department, and send the report at the earliest, in any case not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.  In case any encroachment is reported, the HR & CE Department would proceed to remove the encroachment by taking the process, as provided under the provisions of HR & CE Act, 1959.  There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                              

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:   04.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.19869 of 2022 A.Radhakrishnan      … Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
தமிழகத்தின் மூத்த செய்தியானரும், சத்யாலயா நியூஸ் சர்வீஸ் அட்மினுமான சத்யாலயா இராமகிருஷ்ணன் மீது முன்னாள் மத்திய நிதி அமைச்சர் ப.சிதம்பரம் சார்பில் போடப்பட்ட 1 கோடி ரூபாய் மான நட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இன்று தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

தமிழகத்தின் மூத்த செய்தியானரும், சத்யாலயா நியூஸ் சர்வீஸ் அட்மினுமான சத்யாலயா இராமகிருஷ்ணன் மீது முன்னாள் மத்திய நிதி அமைச்சர் ப.சிதம்பரம் சார்பில் போடப்பட்ட 1 கோடி ரூபாய் மான நட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இன்று தள்ளுபடி செய்தது.

தமிழகத்தின் மூத்த செய்தியானரும், சத்யாலயா நியூஸ் சர்வீஸ் அட்மினுமான சத்யாலயா இராமகிருஷ்ணன் மீது முன்னாள் மத்திய நிதி அமைச்சர் ப.சிதம்பரம் சார்பில் போடப்பட்ட 1 கோடி ரூபாய் மான நட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இன்று தள்ளுபடி செய்தது. 2006 காலகட்டத்தில், அரசியல் எரிமலை என்ற நாளேட்டின்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
,judge. MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.No.79 of 2022 S.Selvasekar .. Petitioner  Vs. I am satisfied that prima facia there are materials to come to the conclusion that after confidential enquiry report filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police of Thiruannamalai and the preliminary enquiry conducted on behalf of the District Collector,  a dead person appears to have been working in the MGNREGA Scheme.  Attendance muster roll payment is also been made and some withdrawal has also taken place in respect of the deceased person Amaravathi and hence, I find that it is a fit case to issue a direction to register the complaint given by the petitioner herein. 

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

,judge. MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.No.79 of 2022 S.Selvasekar .. Petitioner  Vs. I am satisfied that prima facia there are materials to come to the conclusion that after confidential enquiry report filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police of Thiruannamalai and the preliminary enquiry conducted on behalf of the District Collector,  a dead person appears to have been working in the MGNREGA Scheme.  Attendance muster roll payment is also been made and some withdrawal has also taken place in respect of the deceased person Amaravathi and hence, I find that it is a fit case to issue a direction to register the complaint given by the petitioner herein. 

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 20.07.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 04.08.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.No.79 of 2022 S.Selvasekar .. Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.Nos.22187 of 2021 & 10040 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.22187 of 2021: Mohanraj Vs. 1.State through    Additional Superintendent of Police,    CBI/EOW/Chennai … Petitioner/Accused No.1    Crime No.R.C.No.12/E/2011. For Petitioner        : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Jagadeesan                              For R1                   : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor for CBI                              For R2                   : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)                              For R3 to R5          : in Crl.O.P.No.10040 of 2022: direction to complete the trail

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.Nos.22187 of 2021 & 10040 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.22187 of 2021: Mohanraj Vs. 1.State through    Additional Superintendent of Police,    CBI/EOW/Chennai … Petitioner/Accused No.1    Crime No.R.C.No.12/E/2011. For Petitioner        : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr.P.Jagadeesan                              For R1                   : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor for CBI                              For R2                   : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)                              For R3 to R5          : in Crl.O.P.No.10040 of 2022: direction to complete the trail

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   RESERVED ON       :  13.07.2022               PRONOUNCED ON : 05.08.2022              CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.O.P.Nos.22187 of 2021 & 10040 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Judge Tickaraman. In view of the fact that the investigation has been completed by C.B.I and also that the arguments has been completed are matter is ready for trial. The stay granted for pronouncement of judgment is also vacated.  Crl.O.P.No.22187 of 2021and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.No.10040 of of 2022

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 8, 2022

Judge Tickaraman. In view of the fact that the investigation has been completed by C.B.I and also that the arguments has been completed are matter is ready for trial. The stay granted for pronouncement of judgment is also vacated.  Crl.O.P.No.22187 of 2021and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.No.10040 of of 2022

 Crl.O.P.No.22187 of 2021and Crl.M.P.No.12024 of 2021 and Crl.O.P.No.10040 of of 2022 The petitioner/first accused has come forward with a specific plea that the sale of property effected by the competent Authority, D.R.O has sold...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version