SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and Justice means justice between both the parties. The interest of justice equally demand that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure of justice are not allowed to defeat the ends of justice. Principles of natural justice are but the means to achieve the ends of justice. They cannot be perverted to achieve the very opposite end. That would be a counter-productive exercise. Therefore, in the present case, this court has no hesitation in forming an opinion that principles of natural justice as contemplated under Rule 3(a) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules were followed by the Disciplinary Authority and the petitioner also availed the said opportunity and the punishment imposed cannot be said to be disproportionate or otherwise. For Petitioner               : Mr.K.Venkat Ramani                                                     Senior Advocate                                                     For Mr.M.Muthappan                 For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan                                                     Additional Advocate General                                                     Assisted by                                                     Mrs.S.Anitha                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                               ORDER           The order of postponement of one increment for one year without cumulative effect, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority is under challenge in the present writ petitio

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and Justice means justice between both the parties. The interest of justice equally demand that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure of justice are not allowed to defeat the ends of justice. Principles of natural justice are but the means to achieve the ends of justice. They cannot be perverted to achieve the very opposite end. That would be a counter-productive exercise. Therefore, in the present case, this court has no hesitation in forming an opinion that principles of natural justice as contemplated under Rule 3(a) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules were followed by the Disciplinary Authority and the petitioner also availed the said opportunity and the punishment imposed cannot be said to be disproportionate or otherwise. For Petitioner               : Mr.K.Venkat Ramani                                                     Senior Advocate                                                     For Mr.M.Muthappan                 For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan                                                     Additional Advocate General                                                     Assisted by                                                     Mrs.S.Anitha                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                               ORDER           The order of postponement of one increment for one year without cumulative effect, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority is under challenge in the present writ petitio

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  : 11.08.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014   M.Mohamed Iqbal                                                                            …Petitioner Vs.  ...

Furthermore, the photographs produced in Court would reveal that there is some construction going to install a deity, which appears to be a recent construction only to grab the land of waterbody and thus, the prayer of the fourth respondent to save it or to direct the Tahsildar to open the deity for offering prayers cannot be accepted because the effort is nothing but to somehow encroach the land of waterbody in the name of religion, despite the judgment of the Apex Court not endorsing the construction of a temple or installation of a deity on the Government land and in the instant case, there is nothing on record to show permission to install a deity or construct a temple. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of.  No costs.  Consequently, W.M.P.No.3133 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.). For the Petitioner in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.S.Venkatesh in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.C.Munusamy For the Respondents                                   in WP.2966/2022                    : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 3                                       : Mr.C.Munusamy for R-4                                   in WP.7021/2022                    : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 2                                       : Mr.S.Venkatesh for R-3                                       :  No appearance for R-4 * * * * * COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)

Uncategorized

Furthermore, the photographs produced in Court would reveal that there is some construction going to install a deity, which appears to be a recent construction only to grab the land of waterbody and thus, the prayer of the fourth respondent to save it or to direct the Tahsildar to open the deity for offering prayers cannot be accepted because the effort is nothing but to somehow encroach the land of waterbody in the name of religion, despite the judgment of the Apex Court not endorsing the construction of a temple or installation of a deity on the Government land and in the instant case, there is nothing on record to show permission to install a deity or construct a temple. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of.  No costs.  Consequently, W.M.P.No.3133 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.). For the Petitioner in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.S.Venkatesh in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.C.Munusamy For the Respondents                                   in WP.2966/2022                    : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 3                                       : Mr.C.Munusamy for R-4                                   in WP.7021/2022                    : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 2                                       : Mr.S.Venkatesh for R-3                                       :  No appearance for R-4 * * * * * COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:   04.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.Nos.2966 and 7021 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.3133 of 2022...

In view of the discussion made above, while we hold the provisions of Section 292CC and the Explanations added to Sections 132(1), 132(1A) and 132A of the Act of 1961 to be constitutionally valid, an interference with the assessment orders is made for the reasons recorded above and, accordingly, the assessment orders are set aside with remand of the case to the assessing authority to pass assessment orders afresh and it would be after taking into consideration the findings recorded by this court. The assessee would be at liberty to advance all the submissions in that regard. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of.  There will be no order as to costs.  Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (N.M., J.)    THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND             N.MALA,J. (sasi) W.P.Nos.3625, 3635, 3661 and 3673 of 2022      10.08.2022. For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3661 of 2022 : Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Counsel for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3673 of 2022 : Mr.A.Shankar, Sr. Counsel for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3625 of 2022 : Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3635 of 2022 Mr.Vaibhav R.Venkatesh for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Respondents : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan Additional Solicitor General assisted by (i) Mr.Avinash Krishnan Ravi     CGSC, for respondents 1&2     in all WPs. A.P.Srinivas, SPC; and ANR Jayaprathap Standing Counsel       for respondents 3 and 4       in all WPs. COMMON ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Uncategorized

In view of the discussion made above, while we hold the provisions of Section 292CC and the Explanations added to Sections 132(1), 132(1A) and 132A of the Act of 1961 to be constitutionally valid, an interference with the assessment orders is made for the reasons recorded above and, accordingly, the assessment orders are set aside with remand of the case to the assessing authority to pass assessment orders afresh and it would be after taking into consideration the findings recorded by this court. The assessee would be at liberty to advance all the submissions in that regard. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of.  There will be no order as to costs.  Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (N.M., J.)    THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND             N.MALA,J. (sasi) W.P.Nos.3625, 3635, 3661 and 3673 of 2022      10.08.2022. For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3661 of 2022 : Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Counsel for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3673 of 2022 : Mr.A.Shankar, Sr. Counsel for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3625 of 2022 : Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Petitioner in W.P.No.3635 of 2022 Mr.Vaibhav R.Venkatesh for M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav For the Respondents : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan Additional Solicitor General assisted by (i) Mr.Avinash Krishnan Ravi     CGSC, for respondents 1&2     in all WPs. A.P.Srinivas, SPC; and ANR Jayaprathap Standing Counsel       for respondents 3 and 4       in all WPs. COMMON ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :  21.07.2022 DELIVERED ON :  10.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.Nos.3625, 3635, 3661 and...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.3359 of 2015 And MP No.1 of 2015   P.Mihiran                        ..                                        Petitioner vs. 1.The Managing Director,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Chennai-8. 2.The Senior Regional Manager,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Old District Collector Office,    Trichy. 3.The District Manager,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Cuddalore District, case dismissed. For Petitioner                         :  Mr.V.Neethidurai           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.Sathish Kumar,                                                                  Standing Counsel for TASMAC. O R D E R

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.3359 of 2015 And MP No.1 of 2015   P.Mihiran                        ..                                        Petitioner vs. 1.The Managing Director,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Chennai-8. 2.The Senior Regional Manager,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Old District Collector Office,    Trichy. 3.The District Manager,    Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.,    Cuddalore District, case dismissed. For Petitioner                         :  Mr.V.Neethidurai           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.Sathish Kumar,                                                                  Standing Counsel for TASMAC. O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10-08-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.3359 of 2015 And MP No.1 of 2015     P.Mihiran                        ..                                        Petitioner...

Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/11/8-11-1128-giri-rajan-%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95-%e0%ae%85%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%86%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%b2%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b3%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d/ [8/11, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: [8/11, 11:28] MP Giri Rajan:sir கழக அமைப்பு செயலாளர், கழக சட்ட துறையின் பிதாமகன், அண்ணன் ஆர்.எஸ்.பாரதி Ex.M.Pஅவர்களின் பவளவிழா பிறந்த நாள் நிகழ்ச்சி அன்புடையீர்! வணக்கம்.!! கழகத்தின் அமைப்புச் செயலாளரும் முன்னாள் மாநிலங்களவை உறுப்பினரும் கழக சட்டத்துறையின் பிதாமகனும். கழகத்தின் மூத்த முன்னோடியும் கழக வழக்கறிஞர்களின் பாதுகாவலராக திகழ்ந்து வரும் மதிப்புமிகு அண்ணன் *ஆர்.எஸ்.பாரதி* அவர்களின் *75வது ஆண்டு பவள விழா பிறந்தநாள் நிகழ்ச்சி

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/11/8-11-1128-giri-rajan-%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95-%e0%ae%85%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%86%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%b2%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b3%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d/ [8/11, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: [8/11, 11:28] MP Giri Rajan:sir கழக அமைப்பு செயலாளர், கழக சட்ட துறையின் பிதாமகன், அண்ணன் ஆர்.எஸ்.பாரதி Ex.M.Pஅவர்களின் பவளவிழா பிறந்த நாள் நிகழ்ச்சி அன்புடையீர்! வணக்கம்.!! கழகத்தின் அமைப்புச் செயலாளரும் முன்னாள் மாநிலங்களவை உறுப்பினரும் கழக சட்டத்துறையின் பிதாமகனும். கழகத்தின் மூத்த முன்னோடியும் கழக வழக்கறிஞர்களின் பாதுகாவலராக திகழ்ந்து வரும் மதிப்புமிகு அண்ணன் *ஆர்.எஸ்.பாரதி* அவர்களின் *75வது ஆண்டு பவள விழா பிறந்தநாள் நிகழ்ச்சி

[8/11, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/11/8-11-1128-giri-rajan-%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95-%e0%ae%85%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%86%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%b2%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b3%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d/ [8/11, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: [8/11, 11:28] MP Giri Rajan:sir கழக அமைப்பு செயலாளர், கழக சட்ட துறையின் பிதாமகன், அண்ணன் ஆர்.எஸ்.பாரதி Ex.M.Pஅவர்களின் பவளவிழா பிறந்த நாள் நிகழ்ச்சி அன்புடையீர்! வணக்கம்.!! கழகத்தின் அமைப்புச் செயலாளரும் முன்னாள் மாநிலங்களவை உறுப்பினரும்...

Justice Anita Sumanth directed the Director General of Health Services (DGHS) to put in place a mechanism whereby it should be enough if the home State withholds the educational certificates in order to ensure that the doctor, after completing higher speciality/fellowship courses, returns back and honours the undertaking to serve government hospitals for a specified number of years because of having studied medicine at a very low fee.

Uncategorized

Justice Anita Sumanth directed the Director General of Health Services (DGHS) to put in place a mechanism whereby it should be enough if the home State withholds the educational certificates in order to ensure that the doctor, after completing higher speciality/fellowship courses, returns back and honours the undertaking to serve government hospitals for a specified number of years because of having studied medicine at a very low fee.

[8/11, 10:23] Sekarreporter1: Observing that India is one unified country and there should be uniformity in medical admissions across the nation, the Madras High Court has ordered that non-service government college medical graduates must...

Mhc orders round up march 10

Uncategorized

Mhc orders round up march 10

  [8/10, 11:12] Sekarreporter1: மாமல்லபுரம் முதலை பண்ணையில் இருக்கும் 1000 முதலைகளை குஜராத்திற்கு இடமாற்றம் செய்வதை எதிர்த்த வழக்கை தள்ளுபடி செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. மாமல்லபுரத்தில் இயங்கி வரும் முதலை பண்ணையில் கூடுதலாக இருக்கும் ஆயிரம் முதலைகளை குஜராத் மாநிலம் ஜாம் நகர்...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com