SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 Order of CJ declaring in a WP of an election. For  Petitioners                     : Mr.V.Raghavachari                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.K.R.Laxman   For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Standing Counsel   for R-1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader, for RR-2 to 4 COMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 2, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 Order of CJ declaring in a WP of an election. For  Petitioners                     : Mr.V.Raghavachari                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.K.R.Laxman   For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Standing Counsel   for R-1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader, for RR-2 to 4 COMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 S.V.S.P.Nagaraja .. Petitioner    ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
(n) if the appellant adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Special Court to remand the appellant to custody as laid down by the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shambhu Nath Singh (JT 2001 (4) SC 319); Before parting with, we make it clear that the observations and findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purpose of considering the application for bail and the Special Court shall not be influenced by the same during the trial or while rendering its decision.                (S.V.N.,J.)  (A.D.J.C.,J.)                   02.09.2022.

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 2, 2022

(n) if the appellant adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Special Court to remand the appellant to custody as laid down by the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shambhu Nath Singh (JT 2001 (4) SC 319); Before parting with, we make it clear that the observations and findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purpose of considering the application for bail and the Special Court shall not be influenced by the same during the trial or while rendering its decision.                (S.V.N.,J.)  (A.D.J.C.,J.)                   02.09.2022.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Reserved on  : 16.8.2022   Delivered  on : 02.9.2022   CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA   Criminal Appeal...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Apro case affidavit in mhc

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 2, 2022

Apro case affidavit in mhc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)   W.P.NO.                                         OF 2022 Srinivasa Masilamani, S/o. Masilamani, No.29/24, Durga Colony, Senthangudi, Mayiladuthurai – 609 001                                                                                                                   Petitioner  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought recruitment under purview of TNPSC. Mr P. Wilson submitted before the court that 2017 ad hoc rules framed under Art 309 for recruitment of APRO temporary posts does not require any specific UG degree .

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 2, 2022

Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought recruitment under purview of TNPSC. Mr P. Wilson submitted before the court that 2017 ad hoc rules framed under Art 309 for recruitment of APRO temporary posts does not require any specific UG degree .

Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE   SUNDER MOHAN, O.S.A.Nos.227, 231 & 232 of 2022 and   C.M.P. Nos.13833,13853 and 13855  of 2022 Thiru. K.Palaniswamy, Joint Co-Ordinator/ Party Head Quarter’s Secretary, AIADMK. For Appellant Mr.C.S.Vaidyanathan,Senior Counsel,          (in all OSAs) Mr.C.AryamaSundaram,Senior Counsel, Mr.Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel, for Mr.K.Gowtham Kumar, Mr.E.Balamurugan, Mr.N.S. Amogh Sinha Mr.P.Manoj Kumar          Respondents Mr.R.Gurukrishna Kumar, Senior Counsel (in O.S.A.No.227/2022) for  Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi. – R1 Mr.Balaji Srinivasan for Mr.M.Jothi Kumar, Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja and Mr.M.Tamilarasan – R5 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal and Mrs. Narmadha Sampath for Mr.C.Vigneshwaran – R6          Respondents    Mr.A.K. Sriram (in O.S.A.Nos.231 and for Mr.N.Pasupathi – R1  232 of 2022) Mr.P.H. Arvind Pandian, Senior Counsel, For Mr.C.Thirumaran and Mr.R.V. Babu – R4 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal and Mrs. Narmadha Sampath for Mr.C.Vigneshwaran – R5  COMMON JUDGMENT M. DURAISWAMY, J. ,

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 2, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE   SUNDER MOHAN, O.S.A.Nos.227, 231 & 232 of 2022 and   C.M.P. Nos.13833,13853 and 13855  of 2022 Thiru. K.Palaniswamy, Joint Co-Ordinator/ Party Head Quarter’s Secretary, AIADMK. For Appellant Mr.C.S.Vaidyanathan,Senior Counsel,          (in all OSAs) Mr.C.AryamaSundaram,Senior Counsel, Mr.Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel, for Mr.K.Gowtham Kumar, Mr.E.Balamurugan, Mr.N.S. Amogh Sinha Mr.P.Manoj Kumar          Respondents Mr.R.Gurukrishna Kumar, Senior Counsel (in O.S.A.No.227/2022) for  Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi. – R1 Mr.Balaji Srinivasan for Mr.M.Jothi Kumar, Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja and Mr.M.Tamilarasan – R5 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal and Mrs. Narmadha Sampath for Mr.C.Vigneshwaran – R6          Respondents    Mr.A.K. Sriram (in O.S.A.Nos.231 and for Mr.N.Pasupathi – R1  232 of 2022) Mr.P.H. Arvind Pandian, Senior Counsel, For Mr.C.Thirumaran and Mr.R.V. Babu – R4 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal and Mrs. Narmadha Sampath for Mr.C.Vigneshwaran – R5  COMMON JUDGMENT M. DURAISWAMY, J. ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS                                 RESERVED ON :    25.08.2022                                                             DELIVERED ON :  02.09.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE   SUNDER MOHAN, O.S.A.Nos.227, 231...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version