SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

1: Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha of Madras High Court refuses to reject election petition filed by DMK candidate T. Senguttoven against AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar. An election petition was filed by DMK candidate T. Senguttoven challenging the election of

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 18, 2022

1: Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha of Madras High Court refuses to reject election petition filed by DMK candidate T. Senguttoven against AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar. An election petition was filed by DMK candidate T. Senguttoven challenging the election of

[10/18, 14:21] Sekarreporter 1: Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha of Madras High Court refuses to reject election petition filed by DMK candidate T. Senguttoven against AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar. An election petition was filed...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter 1: [10/18, 09:00] Srinvasan Mba: We regret to inform you that our Beloved Former President and Former Advocate General of Tamil Nadu Senior Advocate Shri R. Krishnamoorthy passed away a short while ago in the hospital. Further details will be shared shortly regarding the ceremonies

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 18, 2022

Sekarreporter 1: [10/18, 09:00] Srinvasan Mba: We regret to inform you that our Beloved Former President and Former Advocate General of Tamil Nadu Senior Advocate Shri R. Krishnamoorthy passed away a short while ago in the hospital. Further details will be shared shortly regarding the ceremonies

[10/18, 09:46] Sekarreporter 1: [10/18, 09:00] Srinvasan Mba: We regret to inform you that our Beloved Former President and Former Advocate General of Tamil Nadu Senior Advocate Shri R. Krishnamoorthy passed away a short...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Honourable  Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN H.C.P.No.1884 of 2022 Mrs.Karthika              “6. It is quite often said that behind every successful man, there is a woman and according to me, it is not a single woman, but women, namely, mother and wife, who are two eyes of a man. In a family, wife is a root and husband is a trunk and other members of a family are branches. If the root is damaged, the entire family will get ruined. It is also equally important for a man to provide a sense of safety and security to his better half, who joined hands with a lot of expectations. Though this Court is not a fact finding authority to examine as to who is at fault, in my view, the petitioner must have thrown all her egos for the welfare of her children, instead of foisting cases on the 4th respondent one after the other.”      

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 18, 2022

The Honourable  Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN H.C.P.No.1884 of 2022 Mrs.Karthika              “6. It is quite often said that behind every successful man, there is a woman and according to me, it is not a single woman, but women, namely, mother and wife, who are two eyes of a man. In a family, wife is a root and husband is a trunk and other members of a family are branches. If the root is damaged, the entire family will get ruined. It is also equally important for a man to provide a sense of safety and security to his better half, who joined hands with a lot of expectations. Though this Court is not a fact finding authority to examine as to who is at fault, in my view, the petitioner must have thrown all her egos for the welfare of her children, instead of foisting cases on the 4th respondent one after the other.”      

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED: 23.09.2022   Coram   The Honourable  Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN   H.C.P.No.1884 of 2022 Mrs.Karthika                                                                                … Petitioner -vs-...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court october 17th 9 orders sivaji case raka

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 18, 2022

Madras high court october 17th 9 orders sivaji case raka

[10/17, 11:04] Sekarreporter 1: இந்து மதம் மற்றும் இந்துக்கள் குறித்து பேசியதாக திமுக எம்.பி. ஆ.ராசா மீது நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதற்கு முகாந்திராம் இல்லை என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் காவல்துறை தெரிவித்துள்ளது கடந்த செப்டம்பர் மாதம் 6ம் தேதி சென்னை பெரியார் திடலில் நடைபெற்ற நிகழ்ச்சியில்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.11184 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.No.5726 of 2019 Vikas Rambal,     Director,     Sunrise International Labs Ltd, Perdaman Group Company. Petitioners : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel, for   Mrs.Kiruthika Gokulakrishnan                                  For Respondent        : Mr.N.S.Suganthan,   Government Advocate (Crl.Side).       Quash case order )

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 18, 2022

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.11184 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.No.5726 of 2019 Vikas Rambal,     Director,     Sunrise International Labs Ltd, Perdaman Group Company. Petitioners : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel, for   Mrs.Kiruthika Gokulakrishnan                                  For Respondent        : Mr.N.S.Suganthan,   Government Advocate (Crl.Side).       Quash case order )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 29.09.2022 Pronounced on :   12 .10.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.11184 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.No.5726 of 2019 Vikas Rambal, Director, Sunrise...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368 to 9371 of 2020 & 4281 of 2021 Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, Madurai through its Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer         … Petitioner full For Petitioner           : Mr.S.Manohar                                  For R1 and R2          : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan   Additional Government Pleader                          For R3      : Mr.T.Joseph Jayakumar                              R4  : Died                          For R5      : Mr.R.Murali                          For R6 : Mr.S.Madhavan                                                    for Mr.Arun Srivatsava O R D E R

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 17, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368 to 9371 of 2020 & 4281 of 2021 Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, Madurai through its Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer         … Petitioner full For Petitioner           : Mr.S.Manohar                                  For R1 and R2          : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan   Additional Government Pleader                          For R3      : Mr.T.Joseph Jayakumar                              R4  : Died                          For R5      : Mr.R.Murali                          For R6 : Mr.S.Madhavan                                                    for Mr.Arun Srivatsava O R D E R

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON                     :   25.08.2022 PRONOUNCED ON :  11.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597 of 2021 and For Appellants             :Mr.R.Baskar Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R1 :Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R2 :Mr.S.Venkatesan *** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.). This Court is unable to find any justification as to why the State intends to pay additional compensation by acquiring private lands, when alternative Government poramboke lands are available, as contended by the Writ Petitioners.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 17, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597 of 2021 and For Appellants             :Mr.R.Baskar Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R1 :Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R2 :Mr.S.Venkatesan *** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.). This Court is unable to find any justification as to why the State intends to pay additional compensation by acquiring private lands, when alternative Government poramboke lands are available, as contended by the Writ Petitioners.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON: 01.09.2022 PRONOUNCED ON: 23.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A(MD)Nos.1016 to 1018 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4594, 4596 and 4597...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version