SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

No quash minister ponmudi case. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.254 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.5515 of 2021 K.Ponmudi                                        … Petitioner 17.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of the trial Court, dated 08.03.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.5302 of 2019 in Special Case No.3 of 2019 and the same is, hereby, affirmed.  Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.  Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Vs. State rep. by.For Petitioner                           :     Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Sriram                                  For Respondent                           :              Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, State Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor ***** ,

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 12, 2022

No quash minister ponmudi case. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.254 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.5515 of 2021 K.Ponmudi                                        … Petitioner 17.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of the trial Court, dated 08.03.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.5302 of 2019 in Special Case No.3 of 2019 and the same is, hereby, affirmed.  Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.  Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Vs. State rep. by.For Petitioner                           :     Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Sriram                                  For Respondent                           :              Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, State Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor ***** ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON        : 05.01.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 11.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.254 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.5515 of 2021 K.Ponmudi                                        … Petitioner...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice M Nirmal Kumar of Madras HC has refused to quash a case booked against Minister I Periyasamy & retired IPS officer Jaffar Sait’s wife for alleged irregularities in allotment of TNHB plots. Savukku Shankar is the complainant in this case. Charge sheet not quashed against minister THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.Nos.30357 & 31323 of 2019 and CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 and CRL.M.P.Nos.16426, 17085 & 17088 of 2019 and 1047, 1049, 4170 & 4171 of 2020. For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.30357 of 2019  :  Mr.I.Subramaniam, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Mubarak Ahmad, M/s.Ahmad Associates For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.31323 of 2019  :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.A.Saravanan For Petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.147 of 2020     :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.S.Manuraj For Petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.527 of 2020     :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.S.Anbalagan For Respondent in CRL.O.P.No.30357 of 2019 and CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 and for R1 in CRL.O.P.No.31323                of 2019             : Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, State Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 in CRL.O.P.No.31323 of 2019 : Mr.N.Ramesh ***** COMMON ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 12, 2022

Justice M Nirmal Kumar of Madras HC has refused to quash a case booked against Minister I Periyasamy & retired IPS officer Jaffar Sait’s wife for alleged irregularities in allotment of TNHB plots. Savukku Shankar is the complainant in this case. Charge sheet not quashed against minister THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.Nos.30357 & 31323 of 2019 and CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 and CRL.M.P.Nos.16426, 17085 & 17088 of 2019 and 1047, 1049, 4170 & 4171 of 2020. For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.30357 of 2019  :  Mr.I.Subramaniam, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Mubarak Ahmad, M/s.Ahmad Associates For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.31323 of 2019  :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.A.Saravanan For Petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.147 of 2020     :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.S.Manuraj For Petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.527 of 2020     :  Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel for           Mr.S.Anbalagan For Respondent in CRL.O.P.No.30357 of 2019 and CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 and for R1 in CRL.O.P.No.31323                of 2019             : Mr.Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, State Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 in CRL.O.P.No.31323 of 2019 : Mr.N.Ramesh ***** COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON          :   05.01.2022    PRONOUNCED ON   :   11.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.Nos.30357 & 31323 of 2019 and CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Fixed Deposit receipt be kept in the safe custody of the Court.  Gold jewels, viz., items 1 to 16 in the Mahazar are ordered to be returned to the petitioner as interim custody, after taking necessary photographs at the cost of the petitioner and on the petitioner executing a bond for the value of the gold jewels – items 1 to 16 as valued by the bank valuer and on the undertaking that the petitioner will not sell, pledge, change the features of gold jewels and produce the gold jewels as and when required by the Court. The trial Court is directed to take steps to prepare necessary panchanama of the gold jewels including the currency notes. As far as gold biscuits and gold ingots are concerned, this Revision is dismissed.           13.04.2022  mra Index   :Yes/No Internet:Yes Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order To The Special Judge Special Court for trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem. The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Cases Salem. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court,    G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J. mra       order in Crl.R.C.No.269 of 2022    13.04.2022. Petitioner :  Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan for     M/s.A.R.Ganthimathi For Respondent :  Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 12, 2022

Fixed Deposit receipt be kept in the safe custody of the Court.  Gold jewels, viz., items 1 to 16 in the Mahazar are ordered to be returned to the petitioner as interim custody, after taking necessary photographs at the cost of the petitioner and on the petitioner executing a bond for the value of the gold jewels – items 1 to 16 as valued by the bank valuer and on the undertaking that the petitioner will not sell, pledge, change the features of gold jewels and produce the gold jewels as and when required by the Court. The trial Court is directed to take steps to prepare necessary panchanama of the gold jewels including the currency notes. As far as gold biscuits and gold ingots are concerned, this Revision is dismissed.           13.04.2022  mra Index   :Yes/No Internet:Yes Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order To The Special Judge Special Court for trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem. The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Cases Salem. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court,    G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J. mra       order in Crl.R.C.No.269 of 2022    13.04.2022. Petitioner :  Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan for     M/s.A.R.Ganthimathi For Respondent :  Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders reserved on 04.04.2022 Orders pronounced on 13.04.2022  CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN  Crl.R.C.No.269 of 2022 R.Jayanthi                                                         … Petitioner Vs. The State represented by...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN  Crl.O.P.No.27139 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.13735 and 13736 of 2016 SAVANI TRANSPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED. Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram     Senior Counsel     assisted by Mr.G.Sarath Babu     for   M/s.M.Sounderrajan For Respondent-1 :  Mr.R.Murthi  Government Advocate For Respondent-2 :  Mr.V.R.Appaswamee ORDER. For the reasons aforesaid, this Court finds that there are materials in the form of complaint and statements of witnesses supported by documentary evidence to form an opinion that prima facie case is made out against the petitioners for framing charge under Section 420 IPC and in this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed so far as charge under Section 420 IPC is concerned and allowed in respect of charge under Section 406 IPC is concerned.  Thus, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed in part.

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 11, 2022

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN  Crl.O.P.No.27139 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.13735 and 13736 of 2016 SAVANI TRANSPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED. Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram     Senior Counsel     assisted by Mr.G.Sarath Babu     for   M/s.M.Sounderrajan For Respondent-1 :  Mr.R.Murthi  Government Advocate For Respondent-2 :  Mr.V.R.Appaswamee ORDER. For the reasons aforesaid, this Court finds that there are materials in the form of complaint and statements of witnesses supported by documentary evidence to form an opinion that prima facie case is made out against the petitioners for framing charge under Section 420 IPC and in this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed so far as charge under Section 420 IPC is concerned and allowed in respect of charge under Section 406 IPC is concerned.  Thus, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed in part.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders reserved on 02.03.2022 Orders pronounced on 13.04.2022  CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN  Crl.O.P.No.27139 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.13735 and 13736 of 2016 SAVANI TRANSPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.15403 of 2022 A.K.R.Vetriazhagan. 29.Hence following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Dr.Subramanian Swamy Vs. Dr.Manmohan Singh and Another reported in 2012 (3) SCC 64, I am satisfied that ‘sufficient materials’ have been placed before this Court for issuance of positive direction to the respondent to register the complaint filed by the Petitioner herein against the named accused officer and to hold necessary enquiry as contemplated under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and depending upon the outcome of the said enquiry, the respondent/ Vigilance Department is directed to take further action in accordance with law.  30.With these directions, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. ,

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 11, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.15403 of 2022 A.K.R.Vetriazhagan. 29.Hence following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Dr.Subramanian Swamy Vs. Dr.Manmohan Singh and Another reported in 2012 (3) SCC 64, I am satisfied that ‘sufficient materials’ have been placed before this Court for issuance of positive direction to the respondent to register the complaint filed by the Petitioner herein against the named accused officer and to hold necessary enquiry as contemplated under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and depending upon the outcome of the said enquiry, the respondent/ Vigilance Department is directed to take further action in accordance with law.  30.With these directions, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 01.09.2022 Pronounced on   0 4.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.15403 of 2022 A.K.R.Vetriazhagan, S/o.Late.Radhakrishnan, F-101, Raheja Nest Apartments, No.2, Avvai Shanmugam...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (TNSLSA) PRESS NOTE            The Hon’ble Senior Most Judge of Supreme Court of India/Executive Chairman of National Legal Services Authority has directed to hold National Lok Adalats on 2nd Saturdays of March, June, August, November during the year 2022. As per the directions of NALSA, 4th National Lok Adalat is to be held on 12.11.2022 on all subjects matters.        

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 11, 2022

TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (TNSLSA) PRESS NOTE            The Hon’ble Senior Most Judge of Supreme Court of India/Executive Chairman of National Legal Services Authority has directed to hold National Lok Adalats on 2nd Saturdays of March, June, August, November during the year 2022. As per the directions of NALSA, 4th National Lok Adalat is to be held on 12.11.2022 on all subjects matters.        

TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (TNSLSA) PRESS NOTE   The Hon’ble Senior Most Judge of Supreme Court of India/Executive Chairman of National Legal Services Authority has directed to hold National Lok Adalats on...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version