SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016 S.K.Muthugavi   .. Appellant. For Appellant                              : Mr.M.R.Thangavel   for Mr.S.Sathyaraj                                  For Respondents       : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, for R1 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran,   Spl. Government Pleader for R2 JUDGMENT The Appeal Suit :

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 17, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016 S.K.Muthugavi   .. Appellant. For Appellant                              : Mr.M.R.Thangavel   for Mr.S.Sathyaraj                                  For Respondents       : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, for R1 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran,   Spl. Government Pleader for R2 JUDGMENT The Appeal Suit :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 09.11.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 15.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016 S.K.Muthugavi   .....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006 Appeal Suit No.79 of 2006: For Appellants          :  Mr.K.V.Sundararajan For RR 2 to 6 in :  Mr.G.Masilamamani, Senior Counsel A.S.No.79/2006 &    Assisted by Mr.V.Sanjeevi For R-1 in A.S. No.80/2006 * R1 died in A.S.No.79 of 2006 & R2 Notice Served in A.S.No.80 of 2006

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006 Appeal Suit No.79 of 2006: For Appellants          :  Mr.K.V.Sundararajan For RR 2 to 6 in :  Mr.G.Masilamamani, Senior Counsel A.S.No.79/2006 &    Assisted by Mr.V.Sanjeevi For R-1 in A.S. No.80/2006 * R1 died in A.S.No.79 of 2006 & R2 Notice Served in A.S.No.80 of 2006

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON          :      31.10.2022 PRONOUNCED ON   :      15.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006 Appeal Suit...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830 of 2018 M.Kavitha Additional Commissioner (Tiruppani), HR&CE Department. For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel   For Mr.G.R.Hari in both cases                          For R1                                : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar      Government Advocate (Crl. Side) in both cases.                          For R2    : Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja F.I.R. on the file of the first respondent Sivakanchi police station, Kancheepuram in Crime No. 341 of 2018 also stands quashed.

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830 of 2018 M.Kavitha Additional Commissioner (Tiruppani), HR&CE Department. For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel   For Mr.G.R.Hari in both cases                          For R1                                : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar      Government Advocate (Crl. Side) in both cases.                          For R2    : Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja F.I.R. on the file of the first respondent Sivakanchi police station, Kancheepuram in Crime No. 341 of 2018 also stands quashed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 23.08.2022 Pronounced on 15.11.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.27151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal. For Petitioners         : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan     Senior counsel     for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For Respondents  : Ms.M.Sneha, Standing counsel for R1    Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan for R4 and R10    Dr.R.Gowri for R12    Mr.A.S.Balaji for R14    Ms.S.Akila for R5, R6, R11, R21 and R25    Mr.G.Sankaran for R26 and R27    Mr.J.Kather Hussain for R28    Mr.M.Vijaya Mehanath for R36    Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Senior counsel    for Mr.C.V.Vijayakumar for R35 ORDER In this regard, an annexure can be issued containing what are all the documents to be annexed along with the application even at the time of making online application, so that every candidate can scan the documents and upload the same along with the online application so that this kind of quarrels can be avoided in the future years. Also there shall be direction to the first respondent that, from the next Academic Year, whoever makes application under NRI quota, at the time of scrutiny of the application, the first respondent shall take effort to get verification from the Indian Embassy concerned, who gave such certificates, as to the genuinity of those certificates and after getting the communication from the Embassy concerned, if any ingenuine certificates are found, the candidature of those applicants who filed the ingenuine NRI certificates can be rejected.

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.27151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal. For Petitioners         : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan     Senior counsel     for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For Respondents  : Ms.M.Sneha, Standing counsel for R1    Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan for R4 and R10    Dr.R.Gowri for R12    Mr.A.S.Balaji for R14    Ms.S.Akila for R5, R6, R11, R21 and R25    Mr.G.Sankaran for R26 and R27    Mr.J.Kather Hussain for R28    Mr.M.Vijaya Mehanath for R36    Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Senior counsel    for Mr.C.V.Vijayakumar for R35 ORDER In this regard, an annexure can be issued containing what are all the documents to be annexed along with the application even at the time of making online application, so that every candidate can scan the documents and upload the same along with the online application so that this kind of quarrels can be avoided in the future years. Also there shall be direction to the first respondent that, from the next Academic Year, whoever makes application under NRI quota, at the time of scrutiny of the application, the first respondent shall take effort to get verification from the Indian Embassy concerned, who gave such certificates, as to the genuinity of those certificates and after getting the communication from the Embassy concerned, if any ingenuine certificates are found, the candidature of those applicants who filed the ingenuine NRI certificates can be rejected.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 14.11.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.27151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal Rohan Mahesh Avinash Jothish...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016 and 21083 & 37918 of 2017   S.Muthumalai Rani       …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Mr.B.Kumar                          Senior Counsel             The activities of the “Flying Squads” are directed to be monitored by the Head of the Department / Government as the case may be, so as to maintain the efficiency of the “Flying Squads”. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed, with the above directions. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs.                                                 For Mr.T.Sudhan Raj                     For R1, R4 to R6                    : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu                                                               Additional Government Pleader                                         For R2                         : Mr.D.Gopal                                                               Government Advocate                     For R3                         : Mr.V.Murali O R D E R

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016 and 21083 & 37918 of 2017   S.Muthumalai Rani       …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Mr.B.Kumar                          Senior Counsel             The activities of the “Flying Squads” are directed to be monitored by the Head of the Department / Government as the case may be, so as to maintain the efficiency of the “Flying Squads”. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed, with the above directions. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs.                                                 For Mr.T.Sudhan Raj                     For R1, R4 to R6                    : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu                                                               Additional Government Pleader                                         For R2                         : Mr.D.Gopal                                                               Government Advocate                     For R3                         : Mr.V.Murali O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  : 16.11.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016 and 21083 & 37918...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nJlP8FqFvdI [11/16, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: Gambling case withdrawn [11/16, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: ஆன்லைன் கேம்லிங் வழக்கு வாபஸ் Acting Chief Justice wonders how can court pass interim order when no cause of action had arisen due to the Ordinance not having come into force because the Govt is yet to notify it. In the meantime a Bill has also been passed and the Governor is yet to give assent to it.

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nJlP8FqFvdI [11/16, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: Gambling case withdrawn [11/16, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: ஆன்லைன் கேம்லிங் வழக்கு வாபஸ் Acting Chief Justice wonders how can court pass interim order when no cause of action had arisen due to the Ordinance not having come into force because the Govt is yet to notify it. In the meantime a Bill has also been passed and the Governor is yet to give assent to it.

[11/16, 11:34] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC Acting Chief Justice T Raja & Justice D Krishnakumar  a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court news nov 15

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 16, 2022

Madras high court news nov 15

[11/15, 13:36] Sekarreporter 1: தமிழகத்தில் 11 அரசு மருத்துவ கல்லூரி கட்டுவதில் முறைகேடு நடைபெற்றதாக புகாரில் முன்னாள் முதல்வர் எடப்பாடி பழனிச்சாமி எதிரான குற்றசாட்டுகளுக்கு முகந்திரம் உள்ளதால் மேல் நடவடிக்கைக்கு அரசிடம் அனுமதி கேட்கபட்டுள்ளது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தமிழக லஞ்ச ஒழிப்பு துறை தரப்பில்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version