SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

நீதிபதிகள் மகாதேவன், சத்தியநாராயண பிரசாத் அமர்வு முன்பு விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது அப்போது நீதிபதிகள் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில் நாட்டின் பண்பாட்டையும், கலாச்சாரத்தையும் அறியக்கூடிய இடமாக கோயில்கள் உள்ளது. என பலமுறை இந்த நீதிமன்றம் கூறியுள்ளதுகலை, அறிவியல் மற்றும் சிற்பத்துறைக்கு சாட்சியாகவும் கோயில்கள் உள்ளது.

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 8, 2022

நீதிபதிகள் மகாதேவன், சத்தியநாராயண பிரசாத் அமர்வு முன்பு விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது அப்போது நீதிபதிகள் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில் நாட்டின் பண்பாட்டையும், கலாச்சாரத்தையும் அறியக்கூடிய இடமாக கோயில்கள் உள்ளது. என பலமுறை இந்த நீதிமன்றம் கூறியுள்ளதுகலை, அறிவியல் மற்றும் சிற்பத்துறைக்கு சாட்சியாகவும் கோயில்கள் உள்ளது.

*நாட்டின் பண்பாட்டையும், கலாச்சாரத்தையும் அறியக்கூடிய இடமாக கோயில்கள் உள்ளது மேலும் கலை, அறிவியல் மற்றும் சிற்பத்துறைக்கு சாட்சியாகவும் கோயில்கள் உள்ளது. என பலமுறை இந்த நீதிமன்றம் கூறியுள்ளது-நீதிபதிகள்* *மதரீதியான சொத்துக்கள், நிறுவனங்கள் ஆகியவற்றை பராமரிப்பதன் மூலம் வருவாய் பெற முடியும். அதன் மூலம் கோவில் சொத்துக்களை பாதுகாக்க...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court deceber 8 order

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 8, 2022

Madras high court deceber 8 order

[12/7, 10:58] Sekarreporter 1: மின்சார மானியம் பெற மின் இணைப்பு எண்ணுடன் ஆதார் எண்ணை இணைக்கும்படி வற்புறுத்தக் கூடாது என உத்தரவிடக் கோரிய மனு மீதான விசாரணையை சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் நாளை தள்ளிவைத்துள்ளது. தமிழகத்தில் கடந்த செப்டம்பர் மாதம் மின் கட்டணங்கள் உயர்த்தப்பட்டன. முதல்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Plastic review Review Application No.89 of 2019 in W.P.No.34065 of 2018 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J.           Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan, learned counsel representing the Madras Bar Association; Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned counsel representing the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry as well as Madras High Court Advocates’ Association and Mr.V.Chandrasekar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 7, 2022

Plastic review Review Application No.89 of 2019 in W.P.No.34065 of 2018 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J.           Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan, learned counsel representing the Madras Bar Association; Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned counsel representing the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry as well as Madras High Court Advocates’ Association and Mr.V.Chandrasekar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel

Review Application No.89 of 2019 in W.P.No.34065 of 2018   S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan, learned counsel representing the Madras Bar Association; Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned counsel representing...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Musings on Melodious Music          Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan           The story behind the photograph, as narrated by Chozhanadan, is that Lata having arrived in Madras shortly after the release of Gemini’sAvvaiyar, was taken to see the

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 7, 2022

Musings on Melodious Music          Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan           The story behind the photograph, as narrated by Chozhanadan, is that Lata having arrived in Madras shortly after the release of Gemini’sAvvaiyar, was taken to see the

                        Musings on Melodious Music Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan     The story behind the photograph, as narrated by Chozhanadan, is that Lata having arrived...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.(MD)No.22574 of 2022 P.Markandan                                                                      .. Petitioner  Versus 1.The Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    Uthamar Gandhi Road,    Nungambakkam,    Chennai- 600 034. 2.The Joint Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    14/1, Thiruvandran Road,    Palayamkottai,    Thirunelveli – 627 002. 3.The Assistant Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    Alagesapuram,    Near American Hospital Roundtana,    Thoothukudi – 628 002. 4.The Joint Commissioner-cum-Executive Officer,    Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple,    TB Road,    Tiruchendur,    Thoothukudi – 628 215. 5.SrilaSri 27th Guru Maha Sannithanam,    Dharmapuram Adheenam,    Dharmapuram, Mayiladuthurai – 609 311.     6.The District Collector,    National Highway 7A, PSP Nagar,    Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101. 7.The Municipal Commissioner,    44, Palai Road, Tiruchendur,    Thoothukudi – 628 215. 8.The Joint Commissioner,    HR & CE Department,    Alageshapuram, Near Americal           Hospital Roundtana,    Tuticorin – 628 002. 9.The Sub Registrar,    TB Road, Thiruchendur,    Tuticorin – 628 215.                                            .. Respondents

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 7, 2022

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.(MD)No.22574 of 2022 P.Markandan                                                                      .. Petitioner  Versus 1.The Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    Uthamar Gandhi Road,    Nungambakkam,    Chennai- 600 034. 2.The Joint Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    14/1, Thiruvandran Road,    Palayamkottai,    Thirunelveli – 627 002. 3.The Assistant Commissioner,    Hindu Religious and Charitable       Endowments Department,    Alagesapuram,    Near American Hospital Roundtana,    Thoothukudi – 628 002. 4.The Joint Commissioner-cum-Executive Officer,    Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple,    TB Road,    Tiruchendur,    Thoothukudi – 628 215. 5.SrilaSri 27th Guru Maha Sannithanam,    Dharmapuram Adheenam,    Dharmapuram, Mayiladuthurai – 609 311.     6.The District Collector,    National Highway 7A, PSP Nagar,    Korampallam, Thoothukudi – 628 101. 7.The Municipal Commissioner,    44, Palai Road, Tiruchendur,    Thoothukudi – 628 215. 8.The Joint Commissioner,    HR & CE Department,    Alageshapuram, Near Americal           Hospital Roundtana,    Tuticorin – 628 002. 9.The Sub Registrar,    TB Road, Thiruchendur,    Tuticorin – 628 215.                                            .. Respondents

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on      14/11/2022 Delivered on       07/12/2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.(MD)No.22574 of 2022 P.Markandan                                                                      .. Petitioner...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition (MD) No. 20418 of 2015 and MP(MD) No. 1 of 2015 Velmurugan .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner     Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department     Nungambakkam, Chennai. For Petitioner :   Mr.P.Rajkumar For Respondents :   Mr. P. Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for RR1 & 4 Mr. M. Muthugeethayan for RR2 & 3 Mr. S. Meenachi Sundaram, Senior Advocate for Mr. R.T. Arivukumar for R5 Mr.T.Selvan for R6 ORDER MAHADEVAN, J. Therefore, in such circumstances, this court deems it appropriate to direct the respondent authorities to undertake a comprehensive survey and/or audit of the temple properties in and around Tiruchendur Temple and ascertain the nature of encroachment and/or alienation of the same. If there is any encroachment, immediate action shall be resorted to by invoking Section 78 of the HR&CE Act,

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 7, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition (MD) No. 20418 of 2015 and MP(MD) No. 1 of 2015 Velmurugan .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner     Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department     Nungambakkam, Chennai. For Petitioner :   Mr.P.Rajkumar For Respondents :   Mr. P. Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for RR1 & 4 Mr. M. Muthugeethayan for RR2 & 3 Mr. S. Meenachi Sundaram, Senior Advocate for Mr. R.T. Arivukumar for R5 Mr.T.Selvan for R6 ORDER MAHADEVAN, J. Therefore, in such circumstances, this court deems it appropriate to direct the respondent authorities to undertake a comprehensive survey and/or audit of the temple properties in and around Tiruchendur Temple and ascertain the nature of encroachment and/or alienation of the same. If there is any encroachment, immediate action shall be resorted to by invoking Section 78 of the HR&CE Act,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on Pronounced on 22.11.2022 07.12.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition (MD) No. 20418...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.22071 of 2017.      For Petitioners        : Mr.Dr.R.Gouri                                                                       For Respondents :                     For R1                : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, GA                     For R2 & R3      : Mrs.R.L.Karthika, GA                     For R4               : Mr.P.Srinivas            (iv)In respect of unauthorised occupants, the respondents 1 to 4 have to initiate all further actions to recover the arrears of rent or otherwise, due to the Municipality by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant statute  or by invoking the provisions of Revenue Recovery Act, as the case may be.       

Uncategorized

 by · Published December 7, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.22071 of 2017.      For Petitioners        : Mr.Dr.R.Gouri                                                                       For Respondents :                     For R1                : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, GA                     For R2 & R3      : Mrs.R.L.Karthika, GA                     For R4               : Mr.P.Srinivas            (iv)In respect of unauthorised occupants, the respondents 1 to 4 have to initiate all further actions to recover the arrears of rent or otherwise, due to the Municipality by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant statute  or by invoking the provisions of Revenue Recovery Act, as the case may be.       

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED : 28.11.2022   CORAM :   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.22071 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.23125 of 2017     B.Manikammal   B.Radhamani  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version