![HCP or WRIT court cannot order for Parole or Special Leave. Ruled out by the Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras [1/23, 09:11] Sekarreporter1: [1/23, 09:11] Sekarreporter1: H.C.P.No.2097 of 2020 etc. batch IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. SIVAGNANAM](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Madras high court moved to set up museum to display artefacts excavated from Alagankulam https://t.co/kkzKUZX3de via @timesofindia
- Previous story Advt Manoj Delhi: National Council of Dalit Christians filed a plea for including Dalit Christians in SC/ST reservation . “There is caste hierarchy within Christianity as well and conversion doesn’t entail change in social exclusion”, plea says. SC issues notice. [1/8, 12:19] Advt Manoj Delhi: தலித் கிறிஸ்தவர்களை, தாழ்த்தப்பட்டவர்களாக கருதி, அரசு பணிகளில் இடஒதுக்கீடு வழங்க வேண்டும் என கோரி தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கு தொடர்பாக பதிலளிக்க மத்திய அரசுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS