Follow:
- Next story Supremecourt Advt Gs Mani: ஹைட்ரோ கார்பன் திட்டத்துக்கு எதிராக உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் தமிழக காவிரி விவசாயிகள் சங்க பொதுச்செயலாளர் பி.ஆர்.பாண்டியன் சார்பாக உச்சநீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர் ஜி.எஸ்.மணி மனு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளார்.
- Previous story Madurai: Madras high court has upheld the termination of service of a woman who was working as pharmacist in an ESI dispensary, saying the charges against her for submitting forged documents to avail of a loan have been proved beyond doubt. judge ss sunder observed that she was found guilty of the charges by the criminal court though she was discharged on probation upon payment of the entire loan amount to the cooperative society
Recent Posts
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.
- Madurai Bench of Madras HC Stays NMC’s 75% Attendance Rule* *02 May 2026 | Justice*: Hemant Chandangoudar
More
Recent Posts
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.
- Madurai Bench of Madras HC Stays NMC’s 75% Attendance Rule* *02 May 2026 | Justice*: Hemant Chandangoudar