Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Need Medical college case in mayavaram case in mhc

Uncategorized

Need Medical college case in mayavaram case in mhc

By Sekar Reporter 1 year ago

Continue Reading

Previous The state government has informed the Madras high court that ‘Attack’ Pandi, a murder convict in the Dinakaran newspaper office burning case has been shifted to the MaduraiCentral Prison.Taking note of the submission, justice A D Jagadish Chandira closed the petition filed by Pandi.

Next A Division Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday reserved orders on the appeal filed against a Single Judge rulingwhich held that the Lieutenant Governor of Puducherry, Kiran Bedi, cannot interfere with the day-to-day affairs of the Puducherry administration. Orders were reserved in the matted by the First Bench of Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails
K chandru former judge article regarding abolition of tribunal
Sankara subu mhc advt life history
Justice G.R.Swaminathan while allowing the petition said that the respondent authorities are directed to facilitate the uploading of Form TRAN-1 of the petitioner as originally prayed for by him. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Recent Posts

Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails
K chandru former judge article regarding abolition of tribunal
Sankara subu mhc advt life history
Justice G.R.Swaminathan while allowing the petition said that the respondent authorities are directed to facilitate the uploading of Form TRAN-1 of the petitioner as originally prayed for by him. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME