Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where: – *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application. – *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.

[12/05, 07:50] sekarreporter1: Lordship Justice Nakkiran, referencing the division bench’s observations, concluded that the review application filed by News Nation was “not at all maintainable.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/lordship-justice-nakkiran-referencing-the-division-benchs-observations-concluded-that-the-review-application-filed-by-news-nation-was-not-at-all-maintainable/
[12/05, 07:50] Meta AI: This appears to be a legal update where:

– *Lordship Justice Nakkiran*: Made a decision regarding a review application.
– *Division Bench’s Observations*: The judge referenced observations made by a division bench (a panel of two or more judges) in reaching the conclusion.
– *Review Application*: The application filed by News Nation was deemed “not at all maintainable” by the court.

If you’re looking for more information on this case or similar legal matters, you can try searching online legal databases or the court’s official website.
[12/05, 07:50] Meta AI: Here are the headnotes for the case:

– *Case Summary*: Review application filed by News Nation was deemed “not at all maintainable” by Lordship Justice Nakkiran.
– *Key Points*:
– Division bench’s observations were referenced in the decision.
– The court concluded that the review application lacked merit.
– *Outcome*: The review application was not allowed to proceed.

If you’d like me to help with anything else, feel free to ask!