[12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹: – *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court. – *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view. – *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision. Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice. [12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy
[12/05, 07:57] Meta AI: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy’s decision involves a case where the petitioner’s explanation was deemed reasonable and sincere, particularly due to their reliance on expert advice. The key points of the judgment are¹:
– *Reasonable Explanation*: The petitioner provided a valid explanation that was accepted by the court.
– *Reliance on Expert Advice*: The petitioner’s actions were guided by expert advice, which contributed to the court’s favorable view.
– *Cancellation of Cancellation Order*: As a result, the court canceled the cancellation order, effectively reversing a previous decision.
Without more context about the case, it’s difficult to provide further details. However, this decision suggests that the court valued the petitioner’s transparency and good faith in following expert advice.
[12/05, 07:57] sekarreporter1: Case number and order copy
