In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences under section 279, 338 (8 counts), 337 (36 counts) of IPC and hence acquitted under

[12/05, 15:38] sekarreporter1: [12/05, 15:38] sekarreporter1: SAIDAPET,
CHENNAI-15.
Present : Thiru. R. Subramanian, M.A., B.Ed., B.L., D.L.,

IV Metropolitan Magistrate.
CALENDAR CASE No.: 503 / 2013
Dated, Tuesday the 24th day of December 2024.
JUDGMENT
(as per 355 of Cr.P.C.)
1
Calender Case No.
: C.C.No.503/ 2013
CNR No.: TNCH0C-000373-2013

2
Date of commission of the
offence
: 27.06.2012
3
Name of Complainant
: The Inspector of Police,
R-4 Pondy Bazar Traffic Investigation Wing,
T.Nagar, Chennai – 17
R-4 P.S.Cr.No.292/TN2/2012
4
Name and Address of the
accused
: Prasad, M/a.48,
S/o. Dhanraj,
22, DSI Church Street,
Kundrathur, Chennai – 600 069
5
Counsel for Accused
: Mr. George Williams
[12/05, 15:38] sekarreporter1: 👍
[12/05, 15:49] sekarreporter1: 10.
In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences under
section 279, 338 (8 counts), 337 (36 counts) of IPC and hence acquitted under
Section 255(1) Cr.P.C and set him at liberty. The bail bond executed by the accused
if any shall stands cancelled after appeal time is over.
11.
Property Order :
Since there is no property seized by the Investigation Officer, there is no order
in respect of the property.
// Dictated to the Steno-Typist and typed by her in computer, corrected and
pronounced by me in the Open Cou