Meta AI: The Madras High Court, comprising Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan, has stayed the impugned order affecting the South Indian Senguntha Mahajman Sangam, pending further hearing on February 11, 2026. The court considered the appellant’s submission that the directions were issued without challenging the society’s name/title [1].
[10/01, 16:26] Sekarreporter: . Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that without there being any challenge to the name/ title of the appellant society, directions have been issued wholly unconcerned with the issue that arose for consideration in the writ petition, it is directed that the impugned order shall remain stayed in so far as its application to the present appellant is concerned, till the next date of hearing.
List on 11.02.2026.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
07.01.2026
[10/01, 16:26] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has stayed the impugned order as it applies to the appellant society, considering the submission of the appellant’s counsel that directions were issued without challenging the society’s name/title. The order will remain stayed until the next hearing on February 11, 2026 [1].
Seems like a procedural win for the appellant society. Want to know more about the case or the implications of this stay order? 😊
[10/01, 16:27] Sekarreporter: HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,
CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.A.No.4010 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.32533 of 2025
South Indian Senguntha Mahajana Sangam
Rep. by its General Secretary
R.P.Kumaragurubaran,
[10/01, 16:27] Meta AI: The Madras High Court, comprising Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan, has stayed the impugned order affecting the South Indian Senguntha Mahajman Sangam, pending further hearing on February 11, 2026. The court considered the appellant’s submission that the directions were issued without challenging the society’s name/title [1].
Want to know more about the case or the implications of this stay order?
