Madras HC on Law Student Supplementary Exams – May 12, 2026* _Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University case_ *1. What happened* Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University issued instructions in April 2026 stating: _“Five-year

[15/05, 08:29] sekarreporter1: https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/madras-high-court-law-student-supplementary-exams-ugc-rule-10688755/
[15/05, 08:29] Meta AI: *Madras HC on Law Student Supplementary Exams – May 12, 2026*
_Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University case_

*1. What happened*
Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University issued instructions in April 2026 stating: _“Five-year course law students admitted prior to academic year 2018-2019 were not permitted to write supplementary exams”_. This was an abrupt implementation of UGC guidelines limiting exam attempts. 0677

A BA LLB student with 4 papers pending filed a plea. He argued HC had already permitted _“similarly placed candidates”_ in an April 29, 2026 order. 0677

*2. HC Order – May 12, 2026*
*Justice L. Victoria Gowri held*:
> _“This Court is of the considered view that the petitioner should also be given the benefit of writing the examinations. Hence, the respondents are directed to open the online portal, facilitating the petitioner to pay the necessary examination fee and permit the petitioner to write the supplementary examinations scheduled from 13.05.2026 to 05.06.2026”_. 0677

*Result*: University directed to allow him to sit for supplementary exams.

*3. Key Legal Issues*
1. *UGC vs Student future*: University relied on UGC guidelines capping exam attempts. HC prioritized student’s career over _“abrupt implementation”_ of new rule for old-batch students.
2. *Precedent*: Court noted it had given similar relief on April 29, 2026 to other students.
3. *Retrospective effect*: Rules changed mid-course for students admitted before 2018-19. HC said they can’t be denied chance to complete degree.

*4. Broader Context – UGC & Exams*
1. *Break fees*: Earlier, Madras HC barred deemed universities from charging _“break fees”_ for MBBS supplementary classes, saying _“no regulation has been imposed by UGC and NMC regarding extra classes”_.
2. *Two-year LLM rule*: HC read down TNDALU Ph.D. Regulation requiring 2-year LLM, saying UGC approves 1-year LLM too – universities can’t set _“higher standards”_ that impinge UGC jurisdiction.
3. *UGC primacy*: HC upheld _“right and primacy of UGC to impose Regulations for conduct of distance education programmes”_. c4fc5695daad

*5. Pattern*
HC has repeatedly stepped in when universities apply new UGC/state rules retrospectively or add fees not in prospectus:
– *Law exams*: Allowed supplementary exams despite university ban.
– *MBBS*: Struck down _“break fees”_ for extra classes.
– *Evaluation*: Ordered Govt Advocate to re-evaluate law student’s criminology paper due to doubts on transparency. 0677c4fc24bf

*Bottom line*: Madras HC said UGC’s attempt-limit rule can’t be used to _“abruptly”_ block old-batch law students from supplementary exams. Directed TNDALU to open portal and let petitioner write exams May 13–June 5, 2026. Reinforces trend: Courts prioritize student careers when universities implement new academic rules without transition safeguards.

Want the full order text or details on UGC’s actual rule on exam attempts?
[15/05, 08:29] sekarreporter1: Skip To Content
The Indian Express logo
Journalism of Courage
Subscribe

Home
ePaper
Politics
Explained
Opinion
India
Business
Premium
Chennai
UPSC
Entertainment
Sports
World
Lifestyle
Tech
NewsLegalUGC rules vs student’s future: Madras High Court overrules law university’s abrupt ban on exam attempts
UGC rules vs student’s future: Madras High Court overrules law university’s abrupt ban on exam attempts
The Madras High Court relief for the BA LLB student came after an abrupt enforcement of UGC guidelines barred him from appearing for supplementary examinations.
Written by: Somya Panwar
5 min read
New Delhi
May 14, 2026 04:00 PM IST
Madras High Court law BA LLB law student
The instructions issued by the university in April stated that five-year course law students admitted prior to the academic year 2018-2019 were not permitted to write supplementary exams. (AI-generated image)
Advertisement

Make us preferred source on Google

Madras High Court news: Coming to the aid of a BA LLB student, the Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University to permit him to appear for supplementary examinations, after he was barred following the abrupt implementation of UGC guidelines limiting the number of attempts.

Story continues below. Subscribe to see fewer ads.
Justice L Victoria Gowri was hearing the plea filed by a law student, who was yet to clear four papers in the five-year course and sought permission to appear in the examinations until he cleared them.

“This Court is of the considered view that the petitioner should also be given the benefit of writing the examinations. Hence, the respondents are directed to open the online portal, facilitating the petitioner to pay the necessary examination fee and permit the petitioner to write the supplementary examinations scheduled from 13.05.2026 to 05.06.2026,” the Maras High Court said in its May 12 order.

Story continues below. Subscribe to see fewer ads.
Justice L Victoria Gowri Madras High CourtJustice L Victoria Gowri allowed the plea of a law student, permitting him to sit for his upcoming supplementary exams.
The law student had contended that the high court had permitted similarly placed candidates in its April 29 order.

Law student vs UGC guidelines
The petitioner pursued his BA LLB at the Central Law College from 2017 to 2022, during which he cleared all papers, except for four, the Madras High Court noted.
When the petitioner joined the Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University, his college or the university did not impose any regulations or conditions regarding the number of attempts within which a candidate should clear the examinations.
Even the examination schedule issued by the university’s controller of examinations on April 13, 2026, did not mention the aforementioned conditions.
However, on April 22, 2026, the instructions issued by the university stated that five-year course students admitted before the academic year 2018-2019 were not permitted to appear for further exams as per the University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines.
It was mentioned before the Madras High Court that as per UGC guidelines, candidates could write supplementary exams only up to two years after the regular course is completed.
However, such aforementioned restrictions were not imposed when the course was commenced, and suddenly, in the current academic year, a demanding condition was imposed.
When the petitioner attempted to pay the examination fees in the online portal, the portal rejected the petitioner, stating that the registration number is invalid.
Aggrieved by the circumstance, the petitioner filed a plea before the Madras High Court.
Also Read | NEET-UG paper leak: Protests continue for 2nd day in row, NSUI, ABVP members take to streets
‘Irreparable injury’ to law student
Advocate S R Sundar, for the petitioner, submitted that he had only four papers pending, and the sudden imposition issued by the Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University had caused him irreparable injury.
It was submitted that the petitioner’s first examination was scheduled on May 13, 2026, and the other three papers were scheduled on May 21, June 2 and June 5 of this year.
It was contended that due to the examination schedule, the petitioner had to send his representation through email on April 27 and May 4 to the respondent university, but no reply was received.
Thus, the petitioner moved the court.
Sundar submitted that similarly placed petitions had been filed before the Madurai Bench, and the Madras High Court had permitted the candidates to attend the exam. The petitioner seeks a similar decision from the court.
Madras HC steps in to protect disabled law student’s right
The Madras High Court recently directed the Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University to grant a fee waiver to a law student with 40 per cent disability, observing that the implementation of fee waiver measures for persons with disabilities cannot be approached pedantically by clubbing it with reservation.

Also Read | ‘Eligibility depends on application date, not later degrees’: Supreme Court denies relief to law students over state jobs
Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy passed the order while allowing a plea filed by a student enrolled in the three-year LLB (Hons) course, who was denied fee exemption on the ground that he had not been admitted under the persons with disabilities quota.

“When the intention of the State of Tamil Nadu as well as the 2nd respondent (university) is to provide fee waiver to persons with diabilities, its implementation same cannot be approached pedantically by clubbing it with reservation. Persons with disabilities require both reservation and welfare measures so as to provide them with equal opportunities to complete their education along with other candidates,” the Madras High Court order read.

Curated For You
Athiradi movie review: Basil Joseph and Tovino Thomas’ film seems like a millennial’s take on Gen Z
Athiradi movie review: Basil Joseph and Tovino Thomas’ film seems like a millennial’s take on Gen Z
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma won’t hear excise case, to continue with contempt action against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, others
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma won’t hear excise case, to continue with contempt action against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, others
El Nino development during May-June likely to last till 2026-end
El Nino development during May-June likely to last till 2026-end
Expand
Somya Panwar
Somya Panwar
Somya Panwar works with the Legal Desk at The Indian Express, where she covers the various High Courts across the country and the Supreme Court of India. Her writing is driven by a deep interest in how law influences society, particularly in areas of gender, feminism, and women’s rights. She is especially drawn to stories that examine questions of equality, autonomy, and social justice through the lens of the courts. Her work aims to make complex legal developments accessible, contextual, and relevant to everyday readers, with a focus on explaining what court decisions mean beyond legal jargon and how they shape public life. Alongside reporting, she manages the social media presence for Indian Express Legal, where she designs and curates posts using her understanding of digital trends, audience behaviour, and visual communication. Combining legal insight with strategic content design, she works on building engagement and expanding the desk’s digital reach. Somya holds a B.A. LL.B and a Master’s degree in Journalism. Before moving fully into media, she gained experience in litigation and briefly worked in corporate, giving her reporting a strong foundation…. Read More

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd
Tags:
law
law student
LLB
Madras High Court
Top Categories
Explained News
Political Pulse
Latest Opinion
Mumbai News
Delhi News
Pune News
Bangalore News
Bollywood News
Health News
India News
Sports News
Lifestyle News
Latest News
Cricket
Tech Reviews
Gadgets
Mobile & Tabs
Food & Wine
Elections
Fitness
Trending News
Stock Analysis
Live Cricket Score
Screen Videos
International Videos
WEB STORIES
Indian Express Live TV
Screen Awards
Mutual Funds
IPL 2026
IPL 2026 Schedule
IPL 2026 Stats
IPL 2026 Points Table
Mumbai Weather Today
Bangalore Weather Today
Chennai Weather Today
Pune Weather Today
Ahmedabad Weather Today
Lucknow Weather Today
Chandigarh Weather Today
Lucknow Weather Today
Indore Weather Today
Panaji Weather Today
Manali Weather Today
Kodaikanal Weather Today
Thane Weather Today
Bijapur Weather Today
Gulbarga Weather Today
Malegaon Weather Today
Bhusawal Weather Today
Gurgaon Weather Today
Yavatmal Weather Today
Gangtok Weather Today
Thrissur Weather Today
Udupi Weather Today
Koppal Weather Today
Mumbai Weather Today
Dhule Weather Today
Pune Weather Today
Ooty Weather Today
Panchkula Weather Today
Kulgam Weather Today
Kannur Weather Today
Valparai Weather Today
Hosur Weather Today
Indore Weather Today
Rajouri Weather Today
Kolkata Weather Today
Davanagere Weather Today
Metpally Weather Today
Dharmshala Weather Today
Srinagar Weather Today
Tumkur Weather Today
Balangir Weather Today
Greater Noida Weather Today
Kalaburagi Weather Today
Mahesena Weather Today
Hospet Weather Today
PBKS vs MI Score
PBKS vs MI Scorecard
TN Board 12th Result
BAN vs PAK Scorecard
LATEST STORIES
Jumma Chumma vs Tamma Tamma: Bollywood plagiarised the same song twice, composers fought for credit
Saif Ali Khan thought Sacred Games would be India’s Narcos: ‘Felt at home intellectually’
Austerity Measures: Saini cuts official convoy size to four, asks ministers to limit fuel consumption
Kerala SSLC Result 2026 Live Updates: At what time will KBPE announce Class 10th results today?
A non-smoker, 23-year-old thought her tongue ulcer to be an accidental bite: It was oral cancer
Post-matric scholarship scam: HC raps Punjab over delay in registering FIRs
Setting room to press to exam hall: NEET paper trail is CBI probe focus
ISI Kolkata teacher, neuroscientist, ‘Bangla Pokkho’ leader: The many faces of Garga Chatterjee
Kerala SSLC Result 2026: How to check KBPE Class 10th results at DigiLocker?
Sat-Chi reflects on lack of appreciation comment, ‘90% positive reactions’
No car washes, no garden hoses, and maybe no swimming pools: How Mumbai’s housing societies are preparing for the water cut
Marathi signboard crackdown: BMC has collected over Rs 1 crore in fines, 395 shop owners went to court
Sajan Prakash’s quest to get one second better than his best
Centre hikes petrol, diesel prices by Rs 3 per litre each
40 years ago May 15, 1986: PM in Africa
‘Ye Rs 10,000 hain’: Acquitting cop in Aaj Tak sting op, Delhi court says mere words without context don’t prove bribe demand
Follow Us
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Instagram
Download Apps
Android
iPhone
Newsguard
Newsguard
The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
Express Group
The Indian Express
ieTamil.com
The Financial Express
ieBangla.com
Loksatta
ieMalayalam.com
Jansatta
ieGujarati.com
inUth
IE Education
The ExpressGroup
Newsletters
26/11 Stories of Strength
Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards
Light House Journalism
Careers
Quick Links
T&C
Privacy Policy
Advertise with Us
Brand Solutions
Contact Us
Subscribe
Statutory provisions on reporting (sexual offenses)
This website follows the DNPA’s code of conduct
CSR
Copyright © 2026 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
[15/05, 08:29] Meta AI: *“UGC rules vs student’s future: Madras High Court overrules law university’s abrupt ban on exam attempts”*
_The Indian Express | May 14, 2026 | By Somya Panwar_

*1. What triggered the case*
*Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University* issued instructions on *April 22, 2026*:
_“Five-year course students admitted before academic year 2018-2019 were not permitted to appear for further exams”_ as per UGC guidelines.

*Impact*: Barred old-batch students from supplementary exams. UGC rule says candidates can write supplementary exams _“only up to two years after the regular course is completed”_.

*2. Petitioner’s situation*
1. *Student*: BA LLB at Central Law College, 2017-2022.
2. *Pending*: 4 papers. All other papers cleared.
3. *Problem*: When he tried to pay exam fees online, portal rejected him – _“registration number is invalid”_.
4. *Timeline*: First exam on *May 13, 2026*, others on *May 21, June 2, June 5*. Emailed university on April 27 & May 4 – no reply.
5. *Argument*: No such attempt-limit rule existed when he joined in 2017. Exam schedule dated *April 13, 2026* also didn’t mention it. _“Suddenly, in current academic year, a demanding condition was imposed”_.

*3. Madras HC Order – May 12, 2026*
*Justice L. Victoria Gowri* held:

> _“This Court is of the considered view that the petitioner should also be given the benefit of writing the examinations. Hence, the respondents are directed to open the online portal, facilitating the petitioner to pay the necessary examination fee and permit the petitioner to write the supplementary examinations scheduled from 13.05.2026 to 05.06.2026.”_

*Basis*: HC had permitted _“similarly placed candidates”_ in *April 29, 2026* order.

*4. Key Legal Points*
1. *Retrospective application*: University applied new UGC attempt-limit to students admitted before 2018-19. HC said they can’t be denied mid-course.
2. *Irreparable injury*: Advocate S R Sundar argued sudden ban caused _“irreparable injury”_ to student with only 4 papers left.
3. *UGC guidelines vs equity*: While UGC limits attempts, abrupt enforcement without notice violates fairness for old batches.

*5. Related Madras HC Orders Mentioned*
1. *Disabled law student*: Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy directed fee waiver for 40% disabled LLB(Hons) student. HC: _“Fee waiver… cannot be approached pedantically by clubbing it with reservation. Persons with disabilities require both reservation and welfare measures.”_
2. *Exam transparency*: Earlier ordered Govt Advocate to re-evaluate criminology paper after student raised doubts.

*Bottom line*: Madras HC prioritized student’s career over abrupt enforcement of UGC attempt-limit rule. Said old-batch law students admitted before 2018-19 can’t be barred from supplementary exams if rules changed mid-course. Directed TNDALU to open portal and allow exams May 13-June 5, 2026.

Want the full text of the May 12 order or the April 29 precedent the judge relied on?