Justices CV Karthikeyan and K Kumaresh Babu held that Lahari could not seek an injunction against Jain Television and other respondents from exploiting satellite rights in the Telugu dub version of Roja, since those rights had never

[20/03, 07:44] Meta AI: Madras HC dismissed Lahari Recording’s appeals—held it only had limited dubbing/theatrical rights to Mani Ratnam’s Roja and couldn’t block Jain Television’s satellite telecast of the Telugu dub.
[20/03, 07:44] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court dismisses Lahari Recording’s appeals in 22-year dispute over Roja Telugu dub satellite rights | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-lahari-recordings-appeals-in-22-year-dispute-over-roja-telugu-dub-satellite-rights
[20/03, 07:44] Meta AI: Right—the same ruling: Lahari lost after 22 years; it doesn’t own satellite rights for the Roja Telugu dub, so Jain Television can telecast it.
[20/03, 07:44] sekarreporter1: 07:44

KB/S

82%

The Madras High Court recently dismissed two appeals filed by Lahari Recording in its long-running copyright dispute over the Telugu dub version of Mani Ratnam’s 1992 film Roja. [Lahiri v.

Jain Television]

The Court held that the company had only limited rights to dub and theatrically exploit the film and could not restrain telecast through satellite television.

A Division Bench of Justices CV Karthikeyan and K Kumaresh Babu held that Lahari could not seek an injunction against Jain Television and other respondents from exploiting satellite rights in the Telugu dub version of Roja, since those rights had never

Home

Section

Search

My App
[20/03, 07:44] Meta AI: Yep, that matches the earlier summary—Lahari’s appeals were dismissed, satellite rights stay with the other side.