You may also like...
-
Prasanth busan case sc today news video
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 19, 2020
-
https://x.com/i/status/2022212349491659034 [13/02, 13:04] Sekarreporter: [13/02, 12:34] Elango Kemraj Kamaraj: Dear Friends! I am K.Elango, Advocate,Enrolled in the year 1988 and practising at the High Court of Madras,Chennai,since then.I am contesting in the ensuing election to the Bar Council of Tamilnadu &
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 13, 2026
-
Lordship Justice S.Vaidyanathan The interim order is that in case the 3rd respondent / father-in-law of the petitioner is able to establish that he only paid the entire premium to LIC by way of NEFT / RTGS / Transfer, other than remittance by cash in the name of his deceased son, then, there is no justification on the part of the petitioner/daughter-in-law of R3 to seek for her share in the amount and the petitioner has no case at all. Judge directed R1 and R2 to circulate the interim order to all its Branches and collect details of similar case for production before this Court by way of counter on 28.06.2021.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 31, 2021