![[6/21, 07:28] Sekarreporter 1: [6/21, 07:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/cannot-direct-payment-of-terminal-benefits-to-mother-if-son-had-nominated-wife-hc/article31878630.ece/amp/ [6/21, 07:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-rejects-plea-on-integrated-medicine/article31879604.ece/amp/ [6/21, 07:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/course-not-being-offered-in-tamil-medium-cannot-be-a-ground-to-seek-reservation-under-that-quota-hc/article31878121.ece/amp/ [6/21, 07:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-to-deliver-verdict-in-udumalpet-murder-case-on-monday/article31879839.ece/amp/ [6/21, 07:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.nakkheeran.in/24-by-7-news/thamizhagam/tasmac-case-highcourt [6/21, 07:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.nakkheeran.in/24-by-7-news/india/medical-colleges-puducherrydmk-case [6/21, 07:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.nakkheeran.in/24-by-7-news/thamizhagam/there-no-place-obc-other-medical-education-institutions-central-government](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Srimathy advocate / Stray Dogs, Structured Streets: A Humane Balancing Act by the Supreme Court In August 2025, the Supreme Court of India revisited its earlier order on stray dogs, crafting a nuanced framework that seeks to reconcile two often conflicting imperatives: public safety and animal welfare.
- Previous story Presidential reference case sc live link today
Recent Posts
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS
- Justice M. Nirmal Kumar of #MadrasHighCourt orders transfer from the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) in Chengalpattu to the JJB in Chennai the trial in a case related to a 13-year-old girl having been subjected to aggravated sexual assault by a gang of 15 persons, including six juveniles, in 2024. The victim’s father had sought for the transfer since the family had shifted to Chennai since then and also on the ground that the JJB in Chengalpattu lacks child friendly infrastructure required for the deposition of the victim. The judge ordered the transfer of the trial against the adult offenders too from the special court for POCSO offences in Chengalpattu to the POCSO court in Chennai. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- The Writ Petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association and affected in-service Government doctors came up for hearing today before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India comprising Hon’ble Ms. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench grants two weeks’ time for the ED to file its reply to DMK former Minister Anitha R. Radhakrishnan’s plea to vacate the stay imposed on hearing of a disproportionate assets case pending before a sessions court in Thoothukudi. The court had granted the stay after the ED approached the court with a plea to transfer the trial from Thoothukudi to Madurai so that it could be conducted along with a connected PMLA case @THChennai Backgrounder 👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
More
Recent Posts
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS
- Justice M. Nirmal Kumar of #MadrasHighCourt orders transfer from the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) in Chengalpattu to the JJB in Chennai the trial in a case related to a 13-year-old girl having been subjected to aggravated sexual assault by a gang of 15 persons, including six juveniles, in 2024. The victim’s father had sought for the transfer since the family had shifted to Chennai since then and also on the ground that the JJB in Chengalpattu lacks child friendly infrastructure required for the deposition of the victim. The judge ordered the transfer of the trial against the adult offenders too from the special court for POCSO offences in Chengalpattu to the POCSO court in Chennai. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- The Writ Petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association and affected in-service Government doctors came up for hearing today before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India comprising Hon’ble Ms. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench grants two weeks’ time for the ED to file its reply to DMK former Minister Anitha R. Radhakrishnan’s plea to vacate the stay imposed on hearing of a disproportionate assets case pending before a sessions court in Thoothukudi. The court had granted the stay after the ED approached the court with a plea to transfer the trial from Thoothukudi to Madurai so that it could be conducted along with a connected PMLA case @THChennai Backgrounder 👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…