You may also like...
-
Answers to the Issues : In view thereof, the various findings of the Trial Court Court jointly in respect of the issues No. 1 to 4 is set aside and it is answered that the suit is barred by limitation and therefore consideration of the plaintiffs’ case on merits does not arise and the ultimate decision of the Trial Court in dismissing the suit is affirmed. The Result: In the result : (i) The Appeal Suit in A.S. No. 542 of 2011 is dismissed; (ii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.01.2023 Index : yes Speaking order grs To The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.2), Cuddalore. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 3, 2023
-
REPORT WITH OBJECTION AGAINST DECRIMINALIZATION OF SECTION 138 UNDER NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT 1881 BY S.PRABAKARAN SENIOR ADVOCATE CO-CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA Upon Decriminalization of Section 138 and 143(1) of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, the entire scheme and purpose of the Negotiable Instruments act and its subsequent amendment for the purpose of using cheque as an instrument shall stand frustrated such a stand will demoralize the usage of Cheque as a negotiable instrument across all sectors.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 17, 2020
-