Follow:
- Next story Justice Anita Samanth delivered the order based on a writ petition filed by M/s. Davinci Leather Pvt. Ltd. The court said that the error in not stating ‘YES’ to availing of the Scheme, such error, admittedly being inadvertent and Mr.Rajinish Pathiyil fairly does not dispute this, should not stand in the way of the consideration of entitlement on merits. While allowing the writ petition said that entitlement itself is concerned, the court has already observed that the benefit of the Scheme would be available to the petitioner conditional upon verification and acceptance of such claim by the DGFT.
- Previous story Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, who found that the claimants did not hold diplomas issued by institutions recognised by the appropriate authorities or by any Act of Parliament. For example, the Justice noted that the Electro Homoeopathy System of Medicine (Recognition) Bill had yet to secure passage through the Indian Parliament and thusly invalidated the petitioner’s diplomas and right to practice. The right of every Indian citizen to health and the right to receive proper medical care by qualified medical personnel is violated not only by the existence of quacks, but also by the practitioners with unrecognised medical [degrees],” Justice Sathyanarayana asserted in her decision. “Eventually, the life of the patient is at risk.”
Recent Posts
- [17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Q9RV-cOqjYI?si=La0UgPv1LzkfvrLx[17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: judge Baratha chakravarthy excellant/Lecture /mediation#in mba chennai/question and judhe answer
- Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).
- Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants/A1 to A5 in S.C. No.60 of 2018 dated 31.01.2020, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Coimbatore, are set aside. Appellants/A1 to A5 are acquitted of all the charges and are directed to be released forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case. The fine amounts, if any, paid by the appellants shall be refunded. Bail bonds, if any, executed shall stand discharged. Consequently, the connected CriminalMiscellaneous Petition is closed. (M.S.R.,J.) (S.M.,J.)16.04.2024
- In response, the music composer’s counsel-on-record A. Saravanan said, the senior counsel had made the statement only in the context of copyright and to assert Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s right over songs composed by him since Echo Recording Private Limited had questioned this right
- judge Ananth venkadesh full order/ driver consume alcohol case / interesting order
More
Recent Posts
- [17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Q9RV-cOqjYI?si=La0UgPv1LzkfvrLx[17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: judge Baratha chakravarthy excellant/Lecture /mediation#in mba chennai/question and judhe answer
- Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).
- Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants/A1 to A5 in S.C. No.60 of 2018 dated 31.01.2020, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Coimbatore, are set aside. Appellants/A1 to A5 are acquitted of all the charges and are directed to be released forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case. The fine amounts, if any, paid by the appellants shall be refunded. Bail bonds, if any, executed shall stand discharged. Consequently, the connected CriminalMiscellaneous Petition is closed. (M.S.R.,J.) (S.M.,J.)16.04.2024
- In response, the music composer’s counsel-on-record A. Saravanan said, the senior counsel had made the statement only in the context of copyright and to assert Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s right over songs composed by him since Echo Recording Private Limited had questioned this right
- judge Ananth venkadesh full order/ driver consume alcohol case / interesting order