Dmk mp r s Barathi sir interview regarding defamation case against Dr Ramadas filed in Egmore court see video here
![அப்பாவு தரப்பு வழக்கறிஞரை குறுக்கிட்ட நீதிபதிகள் மேலும் கால அவகாசம் வழங்க இயலாது என்றதுடன் தற்போது ராதாபுரம் தொகுதியில் அடுத்த தேர்தல் முடிந்து விட்டதால் வழக்கினை சட்டரீதியாக தொடர்ந்து விசாரிக்க வேண்டுமா என்ற கேள்விக்கும் அப்பாவு தரப்பு பதிலளிக்குமாறு கேட்டும் வழக்கு விசாரணையை ஆகஸ்ட் இரண்டாம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தனர். [7/29, 10:15] Sekarreporter1:](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on December 5 an application filed by the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the single largest Opposition party in Tamil Nadu, for a direction to the authorities to carry out delimitation, reservation and rotational process before issuance of election notification for local body polls, taking into consideration the five new districts carved out in the State.
- Previous story [12/2, 11:05] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, when tv, cell phone were not there, names were printed in murasoli and your dinakara. Now you are posting names good. Youngsters are happy. [12/2, 11:10] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, pmk K.Balu advocate is filing defamation complaint against Bharathy in Egmore court. You know, legal principles, ” COUNTER CLAIM”. Will be interesting. [12/2, 11:11] Sekarreporter: 🙏🙏
Recent Posts
- President promulgates Ordinance to increase Supreme Court judge strength to 38
- https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/govt-servant-not-expected-to-take-stand-against-govt-supreme-court-quashes-rs-25-lakh-penalty-on-officer-who-exectued-govt-order-534511 [18/05, 10:15] Meta AI: *’Govt Servant Not Expected To Take Stand Against Govt’: SC Quashes ₹25 Lakh Penalty On Officer* _Supreme Court | Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah & Justice R. Mahadevan | May 2026_
- கட்சி தாவல் தடை வழக்கு தீர்ப்பு. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No. 493 of 2022 Subhash Desai …Petitioner Versus Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents With Writ Petition (C) No. 469 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 468 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 470 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 479 of 2022 And With Writ Petition (C) No. 538 of 2022 J U D G M E N T Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Factual Background… 4 i. A change in the government of the State of Maharashtra. 4
- (no title)
- Supreme Court: MBBS students transferred after medical college derecognition cannot claim govt fee rates in private institutes*
More
Recent Posts
- President promulgates Ordinance to increase Supreme Court judge strength to 38
- https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/govt-servant-not-expected-to-take-stand-against-govt-supreme-court-quashes-rs-25-lakh-penalty-on-officer-who-exectued-govt-order-534511 [18/05, 10:15] Meta AI: *’Govt Servant Not Expected To Take Stand Against Govt’: SC Quashes ₹25 Lakh Penalty On Officer* _Supreme Court | Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah & Justice R. Mahadevan | May 2026_
- கட்சி தாவல் தடை வழக்கு தீர்ப்பு. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No. 493 of 2022 Subhash Desai …Petitioner Versus Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents With Writ Petition (C) No. 469 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 468 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 470 of 2022 With Writ Petition (C) No. 479 of 2022 And With Writ Petition (C) No. 538 of 2022 J U D G M E N T Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Factual Background… 4 i. A change in the government of the State of Maharashtra. 4
- (no title)
- Supreme Court: MBBS students transferred after medical college derecognition cannot claim govt fee rates in private institutes*