[10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: How can they say RO is wrong when the complaint never reached him? He is neither divine nor astrological milord. The ones which have reached are about material irregularities. [10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: what crime has the RO committed? Completely misplaced. Obviously there is none! The man doesn’t bother to make the RO decisions or non-decision a part of the writ. Court: What is the procedure to be adopted in such case? [10/05, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: This is such a rare circumstance, according to me if a letter is addressed to a wrong house, it should be brought back to the correct house. Court: Is there any procedure by ECI?
[10/05, 09:27] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 09:26] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/6zmauYwyV1k?si=FX_G2E2kE0tYgm-j
[10/05, 09:26] sekarreporter1: coURT OF JUDICATUNG
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Cause List Sunday 10th May, 2026
Sr.No.
Case No.
Party
Petitioner Advocates
Respondent Advocates
COURT NO.
42
The Honourable Mrs. Justice
L. VICTORIA GOWRI
The Honourable Mr. Justice N.SENTHILKUMAR
TO BE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL MODE / HYBRID MODE ON SUNDAY
THE 10TH DAY OF MAY 2026 AT 10:30 A.M. ( VACATION COURT) (Regular List)
1
FOR MAINTAINABILITY
WP
19287/2026
KR.PERIAKARUPPAN
VS THE CHIEF ELECTION OLIC AND 5
SHMMED
HYDEER ALI
EEVA
WMP
20544/2026
PERIAK KUPPAN
K. MOHAMMED HYDHER ALIR.SHRIRAM ,J.JEEVA,
News
ELECTION OFFICER AND 5 OTHERS.
20543/2026
KR.PERIAKARUPPAN
VS THE CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER AND 5 OTHERS.
K. MOHAMMED HYDHER ALIR.SHRIRAM ,J.JEEVA,
[10/05, 09:57] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZcEHmZ9Q9–KqCy2_Juc3naQfJtXVhiD?si=GI21Y0l88J3H2t7-
[10/05, 11:18] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 11:17] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxKgVm2Dc96DIhLg1TLg0Ryvx_v0seAGS1?si=xYyELkvOVNgMBIls
[10/05, 11:17] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 09:56] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZcEHmZ9Q9–KqCy2_Juc3naQfJtXVhiD?si=GI21Y0l88J3H2t7-
[10/05, 11:17] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 11:14] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: We came to know on 5th May. The rejection by the RO of constituency 50 was incorrect. It should have been sent back. This is our case. We wrote emails and letters but nothing has happened
[10/05, 11:14] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: My short prayer is that the postal ballot should be sent back to our constituency. It should come back here and it should then be counted. If I am right, the result of the election will change. The number of votes become equal
[10/05, 11:14] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: If votes are equal, there will have to be draw of lots. This is serious.
Court: What is the procedure to be adopted in such case?
[10/05, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: This is such a rare circumstance, according to me if a letter is addressed to a wrong house, it should be brought back to the correct house.
Court: Is there any procedure by ECI?
Rohatgi: I did not find any procedure. All procedures cannot contemplate all situations
[10/05, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: He should have sent it to the correct home. Illegality cannot continue. If the vote comes here, there has to be a draw of lots. How can a person continue, when this is the circumstance. Law says you must go to the speakers, however a writ was entertained.
[10/05, 11:16] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: The court needs to intervene. If its a valid vote, then its a tie. There will have to be a draw of lots. Thats why we are bothering your lordships on a Sunday
[10/05, 11:32] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 11:30] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxC-cuF16VCJvklZ6bbYcqDK8jg0rnQByR?si=XkrC4StfF3RCFk-X
[10/05, 11:30] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 11:29] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: Each constituency is a bilateral dispute. That dispute can be decide only by a process known as the election petition. That can be filed within 45 days. All this is in a self code. Suppose, the allegations are of 2-3 kinds. En mass, I capture 100 booths and making him vote by forcing me out. Election commission cannot deal with this.
[10/05, 11:29] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: All the case cited are north pole and south pole. Chalk and cheese.
[10/05, 12:03] sekarreporter1: Singhvi is now reading case laws to substantiate his point that the writ is indirectly seeking reliefs that can only be decided in an election petition.
[10/05, 12:05] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 12:04] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-8QFiFvMwmvspfCROpK9SdmyP73SM8Wo?si=TyD-O1lSkcT1rrZO
[10/05, 12:04] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 12:02] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 11:37] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: He is seeking a consequence.
Court: We are confined to the prayer.
Singhvi: There is a directly election petition prayer couched as a writ. All this can be done through election petition.
[10/05, 11:37] sekarreporter1: Court: Let us read the prayer.
Singhvi: final prayer is a recount.
Court: There is no prayer for recount, he has only asked for securing the ballot paper
[10/05, 11:48] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: Clever drafting cannot be a substitute to election. What I can’t do directly, I cannot do indirectly as well. Election petitions have to be heard by a Single Judge of a High Court, as per rules, I don’t know about Madras
[10/05, 11:49] sekarreporter1: Court: According to you, instead of filing an election petition they have filed like this.
Singhvi: Otherwise there is nothing in the matter which needs a Sunday hearing. There is a clever camouflage.
[10/05, 12:00] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: If he succeeds on his first part, it has to lead to recount. The consequence is set aside the election. All these cases come under election petition. Court has a bilateral dispute, its between Mr A and Mr B
[10/05, 12:01] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: The court has been invited for a narrower gain in a particular case to lay down wrong law.
[10/05, 12:03] sekarreporter1: Singhvi is now reading case laws to substantiate his point that the writ is indirectly seeking reliefs that can only be decided in an election petition.
[10/05, 12:03] sekarreporter1: Singhvi is now reading case laws to substantiate his point that the writ is indirectly seeking reliefs that can only be decided in an election petition.
[10/05, 12:25] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 12:22] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: He said I objected RO did not decided
1) What is today argued is not raised by him earlier
2) RO has decided the objections he raised earlier
3) The third objection he makes a grievance about the video, it is decided in writing on May 7.
4) Fourth he sent on post, on May 8 when everything is over.
He has to simply file election petition.
[10/05, 12:23] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: It is very unfair to make false statements and it is very unfair to blame the RO. I don’t know what this drama is about. He has not raised any objection he raised in court.
[10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: How can they say RO is wrong when the complaint never reached him? He is neither divine nor astrological milord. The ones which have reached are about material irregularities.
[10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: what crime has the RO committed? Completely misplaced. Obviously there is none! The man doesn’t bother to make the RO decisions or non-decision a part of the writ.
