![sekarreporter1: Mhc adv vinoth pandian 10 law tips [12/27, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Quoting an order of the Supreme court in which it was observed that the conduct of the appellant is unbecoming of a teacher much less a loco parent, the Madras high court has upheld an order, dismissing a Principal of a Polytechnic Institute in Dharmapuri district, for allegedly indulging in Homosexual activities with the polytechnic students. Justice M.Duraiswamy dismissed the petition
- Previous story /madras-hc-upholds-dismissal-of-employee.html
Recent Posts
- Senior citizen case The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.4540 of 2022 & & WMP.Nos.4677 & 4679 of 2022 Karuppan Vs 1.The District Magistrate-cum District Collector, Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance of Parents & Senior Citizens Act, Office of the District Collector, Kallakurichi.
- We direct the State Government to sanction one additional Member to the Commission and see to it that the additional Member is appointed within three months from today. It is made clear that no request for extension of time will be entertained. This we are constrained to direct in view of no steps having been taken notwithstanding our observations in the order dated 6.2.2025. 6. By 25.7.2025, second respondent shall file an affidavit and serve a copy thereof on learned Amicus Curiae. The affidavit shall contain the details of the progress made in complying with the directions given above. Stand over to 1.8.2025. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 16.06.2025 sasi To: 1. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Human Resources Management Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009 2. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Co-operation, Food & Consumer Protection Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar Chennai – 600 003. 4. The Member Secretary State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar Chennai – 600 003.
- The trial Court has rightly rejected the application. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05.06.2025 ep Neutral citation : Yes/No To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch CID, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai -2. 2.The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Saidapet. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ep Crl.O.P.No.16399 of 2025 Crl.M.P.No.10273 of 2025 05.06.2025
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
More
Recent Posts
- Senior citizen case The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.4540 of 2022 & & WMP.Nos.4677 & 4679 of 2022 Karuppan Vs 1.The District Magistrate-cum District Collector, Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance of Parents & Senior Citizens Act, Office of the District Collector, Kallakurichi.
- We direct the State Government to sanction one additional Member to the Commission and see to it that the additional Member is appointed within three months from today. It is made clear that no request for extension of time will be entertained. This we are constrained to direct in view of no steps having been taken notwithstanding our observations in the order dated 6.2.2025. 6. By 25.7.2025, second respondent shall file an affidavit and serve a copy thereof on learned Amicus Curiae. The affidavit shall contain the details of the progress made in complying with the directions given above. Stand over to 1.8.2025. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 16.06.2025 sasi To: 1. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Human Resources Management Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009 2. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Co-operation, Food & Consumer Protection Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar Chennai – 600 003. 4. The Member Secretary State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission TNPSC Road, VOC Nagar Chennai – 600 003.
- The trial Court has rightly rejected the application. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05.06.2025 ep Neutral citation : Yes/No To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch CID, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai -2. 2.The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Saidapet. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ep Crl.O.P.No.16399 of 2025 Crl.M.P.No.10273 of 2025 05.06.2025
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
