SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

Only those professing Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism should be permitted to contest in the 44 constituencies reserved for the Scheduled Castes in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections 2026 in accordance with the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and the latest Supreme Court verdict on the issue, insists a public interest litigation petition filed in the #MadrasHighCourt by Arjun Sampath o

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

Only those professing Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism should be permitted to contest in the 44 constituencies reserved for the Scheduled Castes in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections 2026 in accordance with the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and the latest Supreme Court verdict on the issue, insists a public interest litigation petition filed in the #MadrasHighCourt by Arjun Sampath o

Only those professing Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism should be permitted to contest in the 44 constituencies reserved for the Scheduled Castes in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections 2026 in accordance with the Constitution...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

School/.govt order set aside./THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   W.P.No.44358 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.49488 of 2025   Rukmuni Matriculation School, Rep. by its Correspondent, N.Syamala Devi                                                                            .. Petitioner Versus   1. The State of Tamil Nadu,     Rep. by its Additional Secretary,     Education Department,

மெட்ராஸ் உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் முன்பதிவு செய்யப்பட்ட நாள் : 25.02.2026 உத்தரவுகள் வழங்கப்பட்ட நாள் : 26. 03.2026 கோரம் : மாண்புமிகு திரு. நீதியரசர் டி.பாரத சக்ரவர்த்தி WP எண். 44358/2025 மற்றும் 2025-ஆம் ஆண்டின் WMP எண்.49488 ருக்முனி மெட்ரிகுலேஷன் பள்ளி, அதன் நிருபர்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Most polarised State: Supreme Court orders deployment of central forces to protect judges on SIR duty in West Bengal report by @DebayonRoy

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

Most polarised State: Supreme Court orders deployment of central forces to protect judges on SIR duty in West Bengal report by @DebayonRoy

மிகவும் பிளவுபட்ட மாநிலம்: மேற்கு வங்கத்தில் SIR பணியில் உள்ள நீதிபதிகளைப் பாதுகாக்க மத்தியப் படைகளை அனுப்ப உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு. @DebayonRoy வழங்கிய அறிக்கை

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira of #MadrasHighCourt quashes two criminal cases that had been booked against Union Minister L. Murugan of BJP for election offences when he campaigned in the Nilgiris constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. @THChennai

2024 மக்களவைத் தேர்தலின்போது நீலகிரி தொகுதியில் பிரச்சாரம் செய்த பாஜகவைச் சேர்ந்த மத்திய அமைச்சர் எல். முருகனுக்கு எதிராக தேர்தல் விதிமீறல்களுக்காகப் பதிவு செய்யப்பட்டிருந்த இரண்டு கிரிமினல் வழக்குகளை சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி ஏ.டி. ஜெகதீஷ் சந்திரா ரத்து செய்தார். @THChennai

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

cricket match/The Chief Justice wonders how the court can prevent conduct of matches when there’s no prohibition under the law. “If you don’t want to watch the match, you sit at home,” the Chief Justice tells the counsel. “What is your problem if the matches are conducted?” asks Justice Arul Murugan. They refuse to permit a lunch motion. @THChennai

#MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan deny request for urgent hearing of a case filed against conduct of IPL cricket matches in Chennai during elections. Judges say the case...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 97 : sarojinidevi A rep by power agent vs R Arumugam : code of civil procedure and civil rules of practice permits appearance of non – advocate to conduct litigation [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 187 : vijay singh vs shanti devi SC : once ex parte decree is set aside , parties would be relegated to position at which they were when ex parte decree was passed ( order 9 rule 13 CPC 1908 ) [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 1996 (9) SCC 74 : secretary , Hailakandi bar association vs state of assam : Belated apology cannot be accepted in a contempt proceedings , because it is presumed not been given in good faith

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 97 : sarojinidevi A rep by power agent vs R Arumugam : code of civil procedure and civil rules of practice permits appearance of non – advocate to conduct litigation [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 187 : vijay singh vs shanti devi SC : once ex parte decree is set aside , parties would be relegated to position at which they were when ex parte decree was passed ( order 9 rule 13 CPC 1908 ) [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 1996 (9) SCC 74 : secretary , Hailakandi bar association vs state of assam : Belated apology cannot be accepted in a contempt proceedings , because it is presumed not been given in good faith

[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 2, 2026

Election order THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.10885 and 10892 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.11833, 11834, 11836 and 11839 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:   25.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.10885 and 10892 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.11833, 11834,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version