SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

Judge Baratha chakraverthy absence of any enforceable statutory obligation, the impugned action relating to the removal of the Pastorate Chairman cannot be construed as a discharge of a public duty. It becomes an internal dispute within the educational agency.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date of Reserving the Order Date of Pronouncing the Order 18.03.2026 02.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.7181 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.5870 and 5871...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth and Honourable Mr. Justice C. Kumarappan, has directed that if negotiations between the petitioners and authorities permit construction of a compound wall around the Enclave, the water course must remain outside the compound walls. This ruling emphasizes the importance of preserving water courses and ensuring that

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth and Honourable Mr. Justice C. Kumarappan, has directed that if negotiations between the petitioners and authorities permit construction of a compound wall around the Enclave, the water course must remain outside the compound walls. This ruling emphasizes the importance of preserving water courses and ensuring that

The Madras High Court, comprising Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth and Honourable Mr. Justice C. Kumarappan, has directed that if negotiations between the petitioners and authorities permit construction of a compound wall around the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

  HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P. Nos.32596 of 2014, 2276, 404, 16, 24, 2597, 29, 32, 35, 397, 401 / If at all the negotiations qua the petitioners and the authorities lead to the conclusion that the petitioners would be permitted to construct a compound wall around the Enclave, it must be such that the water course stands outside the compound walls

2026:MHC:1368 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON :  06.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P. Nos.32596 of 2014, 2276,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 7, 2026

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.    P(MD)No. 7604 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD) No.6236 of 2026 Sathiyaraj                                      … Petitioner Vs 1.  The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Chennai -34.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :18.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.    P(MD)No. 7604 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD) No.6236 of 2026 Sathiyaraj                                      … Petitioner Vs 1.  The Commissioner,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 7, 2026

HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.1956 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Vaiko General Secretary Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, ‘Thayagam’

2026:MHC:820 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.1956 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Vaiko General...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[07/04, 17:26] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxq78CQcp0jnREsPBx8WHzOShu8GwVjvjH?si=1AM8seX_bUknb7Sm [07/04, 17:27] sekarreporter1: STORY | Woman can’t be treated as ‘untouchable’ for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case A woman cannot be treated as “untouchable” for three days in a month and then cease to be considered untouchable on the fourth day, Supreme Court judge BV Nagarathna remarked on Tuesday. The remark came while a nine-judge bench was hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala temple of Keralam, and on the ambit and scope of religious freedom practised by multiple faiths. The constitution bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices B V Nagarathna, M M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 7, 2026

[07/04, 17:26] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxq78CQcp0jnREsPBx8WHzOShu8GwVjvjH?si=1AM8seX_bUknb7Sm [07/04, 17:27] sekarreporter1: STORY | Woman can’t be treated as ‘untouchable’ for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case A woman cannot be treated as “untouchable” for three days in a month and then cease to be considered untouchable on the fourth day, Supreme Court judge BV Nagarathna remarked on Tuesday. The remark came while a nine-judge bench was hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala temple of Keralam, and on the ambit and scope of religious freedom practised by multiple faiths. The constitution bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices B V Nagarathna, M M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

[07/04, 17:26] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxq78CQcp0jnREsPBx8WHzOShu8GwVjvjH?si=1AM8seX_bUknb7Sm [07/04, 17:27] sekarreporter1: STORY | Woman can’t be treated as ‘untouchable’ for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case A woman cannot be treated as “untouchable” for three days in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version