Category: Uncategorized

Temple fund case mhc order for petner senior advt Ravi sesathiri for advt B Jeganathan argued for govt aag Pv B

Temple fund case mhc order for petner senior advt Ravi sesathiri for advt B Jeganathan argued for govt aag Pv B

தமிழ்நாடு மின்விசை நிதி மற்றும் அடிப்படை வசதி மேம்பாட்டு நிறுவனத்தில் முதலீடு செய்யப்பட்டுள்ள கோவில் நிதி பாதுகாப்பாக இருக்கும் என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் தமிழக அரசு உத்தரவாதம் அளித்துள்ளது. கோவில்களின் உபரி நிதியை தமிழ்நாடு அரசின் நிறுவனங்களில் முதலீடு செய்ய அனுமதிக்கும் வகையில், அறநிலையத்துறை சட்டத்தின்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[29/05, 14:06] Former Justice Jegathessan: What’s corruption? Is it just receiving money and/ or kind . Mental corruption is more dangerous since it can’t be defined. But can be identified by actions, deeds and results. [29/05, 14:45] Former Justice Jegathessan: Judges must have self restraint in comments [29/05, 15:05] sekarreporter1: 👍

[29/05, 14:06] Former Justice Jegathessan: What’s corruption? Is it just receiving money and/ or kind . Mental corruption is more dangerous since it can’t be defined. But can be identified by actions, deeds and results. [29/05, 14:45] Former Justice Jegathessan: Judges must have self restraint in comments [29/05, 15:05] sekarreporter1: 👍

[29/05, 14:06] Former Justice Jegathessan: What’s corruption? Is it just receiving money and/ or kind . Mental corruption is more dangerous since it can’t be defined. But can be identified by actions, deeds and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Ips arun order quashed THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN H.C.P.No.2066 of 2025 Varsha Sharma D/o Santhosh Sharma No.15, Karpagam Garden 1st Main Road, Rajali Apartment 3rd Floor, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. … Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home and Prohibition, Excise Department Fort

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 27.05.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 29.05.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN H.C.P.No.2066 of 2025 Varsha Sharma...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxO6towD6YG58MG2OgJCc_pHflYTh7qchi?si=dfAmoUM3AvuTCGFl [29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: Here’s the advance order passed by Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt quashing the Goondas detention order issued by former Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun (now serving as Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption) on September 22, 2025 for detaining realtor Santhosh Sharma under the preventive detention law on the basis of multiple cheating complaints including the one given by DMDK Rajya Sabha member L.K. Sudhish’s wife S. Poornajothi @THChenna

[29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxO6towD6YG58MG2OgJCc_pHflYTh7qchi?si=dfAmoUM3AvuTCGFl [29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: Here’s the advance order passed by Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt quashing the Goondas detention order issued by former Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun (now serving as Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption) on September 22, 2025 for detaining realtor Santhosh Sharma under the preventive detention law on the basis of multiple cheating complaints including the one given by DMDK Rajya Sabha member L.K. Sudhish’s wife S. Poornajothi @THChenna

[29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxO6towD6YG58MG2OgJCc_pHflYTh7qchi?si=dfAmoUM3AvuTCGFl [29/05, 21:02] sekarreporter1: Here’s the advance order passed by Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt quashing the Goondas detention order issued by former Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
“Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan in a statutory appeal challenging the decision of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, observed, “In our view, the PFUTP Regulations cannot be attracted on the sole circumstance of the appellant no. 1 using 12 agency agreements to take excess position limits and it was necessary for the respondent to prove whether the manner in which these agency agreements were utilised was fraudulent or not”.”  https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/reliance-industries-limited-v-the-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-2026-insc-585-447-crore-disgorgement-2007-rpl-1614931#:~:text=Justice%20J.B.%20Pardiwala%20and,utilised%20was%20fraudulent%20or%20not%E2%80%9D.

“Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan in a statutory appeal challenging the decision of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, observed, “In our view, the PFUTP Regulations cannot be attracted on the sole circumstance of the appellant no. 1 using 12 agency agreements to take excess position limits and it was necessary for the respondent to prove whether the manner in which these agency agreements were utilised was fraudulent or not”.” https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/reliance-industries-limited-v-the-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-2026-insc-585-447-crore-disgorgement-2007-rpl-1614931#:~:text=Justice%20J.B.%20Pardiwala%20and,utilised%20was%20fraudulent%20or%20not%E2%80%9D.

“Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan in a statutory appeal challenging the decision of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, observed, “In our view, the PFUTP Regulations cannot be attracted on the sole circumstance of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version