Category: Uncategorized

In the result, in view of the reasons stated above, this court found Accused is  guilty of dishonour of cheques for the offence u/s of 138 N I Act r/w Section 255(2) Cr.P.C. and Accused is convicted and sentenced to undergo Two Years simple imprisonment and to pay Compensation of Rs.1,00,00,000/- u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C. being the cheques amount to the Complainant within two months from the date of this Judgment.  In default of payment of the compensation, the accused shall

In the result, in view of the reasons stated above, this court found Accused is guilty of dishonour of cheques for the offence u/s of 138 N I Act r/w Section 255(2) Cr.P.C. and Accused is convicted and sentenced to undergo Two Years simple imprisonment and to pay Compensation of Rs.1,00,00,000/- u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C. being the cheques amount to the Complainant within two months from the date of this Judgment. In default of payment of the compensation, the accused shall

IN THE COURT OF DESIGNATED SPECIAL COURT FOR MPs/MLAs viz., III METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT / III JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI-1 Present: Thiru. C. Sundarapandian, B.Com., B.L., III Metropolitan Magistrate/ III Judicial Magistrate...

Mdmk

Mdmk

காசோலை மோசடி வழக்கில், இரண்டு ஆண்டுகள் சிறை தண்டனை விதிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதால், மதிமுக எம்.எல்.ஏ. சதன் திருமலைகுமார், தகுதிஇழப்பு ஆகிறார். மக்கள் பிரதிநிதித்துவச் சட்டம், 8 வது பிரிவின்படி, இரு பிரிவினரிடையே விரோதத்தை ஏற்படுத்துதல், ஊழல் குற்றம், பெண்களுக்கு எதிரான குற்றங்கள், பாலியல் வன்கொடுமை, தீண்டாமையை பின்பற்றுதல், போதைப்...

Sabarimala Gold Theft Case: Kerala High Court grants the Special Investigation Team six more weeks to complete the probe.  The SIT today informed the Court of the interim progress and has been directed to file an interim report by January 19, 2025.

Sabarimala Gold Theft Case: Kerala High Court grants the Special Investigation Team six more weeks to complete the probe. The SIT today informed the Court of the interim progress and has been directed to file an interim report by January 19, 2025.

Sabarimala Gold Theft Case: Kerala High Court grants the Special Investigation Team six more weeks to complete the probe. The SIT today informed the Court of the interim progress and has been directed to...

[05/01, 10:50] Sekarreporter: #SupremeCourt sets aside dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya who was removed while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge on allegations of corruption and adopting double standard while deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. [05/01, 10:50] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya, who was removed from service while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge. Suliya was accused of corruption and adopting double standards in deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had upheld his removal, citing his failure to maintain high standards of judicial conduct. ¹ ² ³  The allegations against Suliya included granting bail to some applicants while dismissing similar applications, ignoring provisions of Section 59-A of the M.P. Excise Act. However, the Supreme Court’s decision suggests a review of the case, potentially considering factors like lack of direct evidence for corrupt motives or procedural improprieties in the disciplinary proceedings.  Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the specific grounds on which the Supreme Court based its decision?

[05/01, 10:50] Sekarreporter: #SupremeCourt sets aside dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya who was removed while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge on allegations of corruption and adopting double standard while deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. [05/01, 10:50] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya, who was removed from service while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge. Suliya was accused of corruption and adopting double standards in deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had upheld his removal, citing his failure to maintain high standards of judicial conduct. ¹ ² ³ The allegations against Suliya included granting bail to some applicants while dismissing similar applications, ignoring provisions of Section 59-A of the M.P. Excise Act. However, the Supreme Court’s decision suggests a review of the case, potentially considering factors like lack of direct evidence for corrupt motives or procedural improprieties in the disciplinary proceedings. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the specific grounds on which the Supreme Court based its decision?

[05/01, 10:50] Sekarreporter: [05/01, 10:50] Sekarreporter: #SupremeCourt sets aside dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya who was removed while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge on allegations of corruption and...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com