Follow:
- Next story SC denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, five others granted bail
- Previous story #BREAKING Supreme Court dismisses bail applications of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat