Author: Sekar Reporter

Gst case full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020 & W.P.Nos. 2723,

Gst case full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020 & W.P.Nos. 2723,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On 15.09.2023Pronounced On . .2024CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020...

division bench comprising Justice R Subramanian ans Justice R Senthilkumar heard the appeal preferred by OPS challenging the single judge order.

division bench comprising Justice R Subramanian ans Justice R Senthilkumar heard the appeal preferred by OPS challenging the single judge order.

[25/03, 14:47] sekarreporter1: + Home NewsTamil Nadu MHC refuses to stay single judge order restraining OPS claiming as coordinator A division bench comprising Justice R Subrama https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/mhc-refuses-to-stay-single-judge-order-restraining-ops-claiming-as-coordinator-776122[25/03, 14:48] sekarreporter1: division bench comprising Justice R...

PT Asha judge directed to recount the 605 postal ballot which was rejected by the returning officer in the Krishnagiri constituency during the 2021 assembly election and file a report before the court.

PT Asha judge directed to recount the 605 postal ballot which was rejected by the returning officer in the Krishnagiri constituency during the 2021 assembly election and file a report before the court.

+chat epaperdtnextHome NewsTamil NaduMHC directs to recount the rejected postal ballots in 2021 Krishnagiri electionJustice PT Asha pronounced the final order in a election petition filed by DMK candidate T Senguttuvan challenging the election...

The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before the Madras High Court.

The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before the Madras High Court.

[25/03, 11:23] sekarreporter1: [25/03, 11:22] sekarreporter1: The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before...

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart from claiming the coordinator @xpresstn

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart from claiming the coordinator @xpresstn

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart...

Order quashed judge manjula /For Petitioner … Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi for Ms.S.VarshaFor Respondents … Mr.A.S.Ragul Adhithyafor Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 ORDER Heard Mr. Naveen Kumar Murthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.S.Ragul Adhithya, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

Order quashed judge manjula /For Petitioner … Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi for Ms.S.VarshaFor Respondents … Mr.A.S.Ragul Adhithyafor Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 ORDER Heard Mr. Naveen Kumar Murthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.S.Ragul Adhithya, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

2024:MHC:1453IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.03.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULAW.P. No.5779 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.6411 & 6414 of 2024Anna Nagar Western Extension Association, Rep. by its Secretary Mr.P.Vadivel, having office at:R13B,...

While quashing the order Justice. R.N.Manjula observed that there was no community hall dedicated to public use in any nearby area and every household may not find it convenient to convene small functions, celebrations or any communal gathering by paying huge rent to private halls.

While quashing the order Justice. R.N.Manjula observed that there was no community hall dedicated to public use in any nearby area and every household may not find it convenient to convene small functions, celebrations or any communal gathering by paying huge rent to private halls.

Earlier Anna Nagar Extension Association has been given with a permission by the then Ambattur Municipality to utilize a portion of the land reserved for public use for constructing a public library and reading...

[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) MLJ 279 : kaleur Rahman vs P kannan : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : striking off pleading or rejecting plaint to be done only where continuance of pleading would be travesty of justice or refusing to interfere would prolong lis[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 288 : Datti kameswari vs marrapu lakshmunaidu & others : evidence act 1872 section 65 : True copies of public documents certified by designated information officer can be taken as certified copies of public documents[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 160 SC : MC mehta vs union of india : Pertaining to air pollution ( BSIII compliant vehicles ) , health of the people cannot be compromised even in the smallest measure[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 471 SC ; Dahiben vs Arvindhai kalyanji bhanusali : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : courts empowered to exercise power under provision at any stage either before registering plaint after issuing summons to defendant or before conclusion of trial

[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) MLJ 279 : kaleur Rahman vs P kannan : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : striking off pleading or rejecting plaint to be done only where continuance of pleading would be travesty of justice or refusing to interfere would prolong lis[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 288 : Datti kameswari vs marrapu lakshmunaidu & others : evidence act 1872 section 65 : True copies of public documents certified by designated information officer can be taken as certified copies of public documents[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 160 SC : MC mehta vs union of india : Pertaining to air pollution ( BSIII compliant vehicles ) , health of the people cannot be compromised even in the smallest measure[25/03, 06:49] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 471 SC ; Dahiben vs Arvindhai kalyanji bhanusali : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : courts empowered to exercise power under provision at any stage either before registering plaint after issuing summons to defendant or before conclusion of trial

the division bench of R. Mahadevan* and Mohammed Shaffiq, JJ. has modified the order of the Judge, granting visitation rights to the grandparents, by restricting it to once every month, i.e., the first Saturday from 2.00 pm to 6.00 pm at the Child Care Centre attached to the Family Court in

the division bench of R. Mahadevan* and Mohammed Shaffiq, JJ. has modified the order of the Judge, granting visitation rights to the grandparents, by restricting it to once every month, i.e., the first Saturday from 2.00 pm to 6.00 pm at the Child Care Centre attached to the Family Court in

Skip to content Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News Powered by Translate NAVIGATION HomeCase Briefs[Custody Battle] Madras Hc Modifies Order Granting Visitation Rights To Grandparents, By Restricting It To Once Every Month [Custody...