SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

Uncategorized

லீடர்” திரைப்படத்தை சட்டவிரோதமாக இணையதளங்களில் வெளியிடுவதற்கு தடை விதித்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

பிரபல தொழிலதிபரும், நடிகருமான லெஜண்ட் சரவணன் நடித்துள்ள “லீடர்” திரைப்படத்தை சட்டவிரோதமாக இணையதளங்களில் வெளியிடுவதற்கு தடை விதித்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. தனது சரவணா ஸ்டோர்ஸ் நிறுவனத்தின் விளம்பரங்களில் நடித்து விளம்பர உலகை கலக்கினார் அதன் உரிமையாளர் அருள் சரவணன். அதைத்தொடர்ந்து கடந்த 2022ஆம் ஆண்டு ‘தி...

MADRAS HIGH COURT GRANTS RELIEF FOR THE FILM LEADER Madras High Court granted an order blocking of 1404 piracy websites from broadcasting the film #Leader illegally through online. Advocate Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for the Actor Cum Producer Legand Saravanan. [02/04, 20:14] sekarreporter1: Came up for hearing before Justice SenthilKumar Ramamoorthy

Uncategorized

MADRAS HIGH COURT GRANTS RELIEF FOR THE FILM LEADER Madras High Court granted an order blocking of 1404 piracy websites from broadcasting the film #Leader illegally through online. Advocate Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for the Actor Cum Producer Legand Saravanan. [02/04, 20:14] sekarreporter1: Came up for hearing before Justice SenthilKumar Ramamoorthy

[02/04, 20:15] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxBCJXHEBfcF3xQSV9rMqcM2Y1d-c2Znz0?si=6iYwwGR55iKAgpWk [02/04, 20:16] sekarreporter1: [02/04, 20:14] sekarreporter1: MADRAS HIGH COURT GRANTS RELIEF FOR THE FILM LEADER Madras High Court granted an order blocking of 1404 piracy websites from broadcasting the film...

Uncategorized

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2026 M/s. Ugro Capital Limited, Represented by its Authorized Officer,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2026 M/s. Ugro Capital Limited, Represented...

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMA No.65 of 2026  and  CMP N   o .635   of 2026 V.S.J.Dinakaran No.7, Thiruvankarasu Street Perambur, Chennai – 600 011. Appellant(s) Vs 1.  IRS, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Benami Prohibition) Room No. 104, Income Tax Investigation Wing

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :  13.03.2026 DELIVERED ON :  02.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMA No.65...

Uncategorized

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :  13.03.2026 DELIVERED ON :  02.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMA No.65...

The Madras High Court, by a Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan, upheld the Appellate Tribunal’s condonation of a delay of 763 days in filing an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority, holding that such discretionary orders are not to be interfered with unless perverse or arbitrary. The case involved alleged benami transactions with V.K. Sasikala as beneficial owner and V.S.J. Dinakaran as benamidar in relation to the Spectrum Mall transaction in demonetised notes . The Court agreed with the Department’s submission that a pragmatic and justice-oriented approach must prevail and that procedural delay should not defeat substantial justice, particularly in matters involving public interest, The appellant was represented by Senior Counsel Vijay Narayan for Adv Pranav Charan, and the DCIT (BPU) was represented by Senior Standing Counsel Mrs.M. Sheela and Junior Standing Counsel H. Siddarth.

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court, by a Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan, upheld the Appellate Tribunal’s condonation of a delay of 763 days in filing an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority, holding that such discretionary orders are not to be interfered with unless perverse or arbitrary. The case involved alleged benami transactions with V.K. Sasikala as beneficial owner and V.S.J. Dinakaran as benamidar in relation to the Spectrum Mall transaction in demonetised notes . The Court agreed with the Department’s submission that a pragmatic and justice-oriented approach must prevail and that procedural delay should not defeat substantial justice, particularly in matters involving public interest, The appellant was represented by Senior Counsel Vijay Narayan for Adv Pranav Charan, and the DCIT (BPU) was represented by Senior Standing Counsel Mrs.M. Sheela and Junior Standing Counsel H. Siddarth.

தலைமை நீதிபதி சுஷ்ருத் அரவிந்த் தர்மாதிகாரி மற்றும் நீதிபதி ஜி. அருள்முருகன் ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு, தீர்ப்பளிக்கும் அதிகாரசபையின் உத்தரவுக்கு எதிராக மேல்முறையீடு செய்வதில் ஏற்பட்ட 763 நாட்கள் தாமதத்தை மேல்முறையீட்டுத் தீர்ப்பாயம் மன்னித்ததை உறுதி செய்தது. மேலும், அத்தகைய விருப்புரிமை உத்தரவுகள்...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com