Follow:
- Next story today mhc quashed Defamation case against dinakaran ramesh sir for dinakaran mhc advt J Ravinthiren sir advt Sneha mam appeared today on video conferencing
- Previous story bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy issued notice to the Centre seeking its response on the petitions and tagged them with other petitions filed earlier against the citizenship law.
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*
More
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*