Follow:
- Next story “Bench of Justice B. Pugalendhi held, “The Courts are obligated to protect the rights of the accused persons and protect their personal liberty pending disposal of the criminal appeal. At the same time, the Courts are also answerable to the victims in the murder cases, wherein the right to life of those victims was allegedly taken away by the petitioner and other accused.”” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026mhc2302-saba-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-1616830#:~:text=Bench%20of%20Justice,and%20other%20accused.%22
- Previous story Good evening, Mr. Sekar, This is Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal. Recently, the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (North) passed an order in a medical negligence case handled by me, awarding compensation of ₹1 Crore to the complainant against three doctors based in Chennai. This case may be useful for young aspiring advocates and the public to understand important aspects of medical negligence jurisprudence. I would therefore request you to kindly consider publishing this judgment on your esteemed website to create greater legal awareness. I would be happy to share the order copy and any additional details required. Regards, Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal
Recent Posts
- T. G. V. Ramani Gopal. Recently, the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (North) passed an order in a medical negligence case handled by me, awarding compensation of ₹1 Crore to the complainant against three doctors based in Chennai.
- THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP Nos. 18045 of 2025 and 1872 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.11843 of 2025 and 1237 of 2026 N. Lakshman Reddy S/o.N.Yellareddy, Authorised Attorney/Manager, M/s.NSK Clearing and Forwarding, New No.194 (Old No.236), Thambu Cheety Street, George Town, Parrys, Chennai-600 001.
- “Bench of Justice B. Pugalendhi held, “The Courts are obligated to protect the rights of the accused persons and protect their personal liberty pending disposal of the criminal appeal. At the same time, the Courts are also answerable to the victims in the murder cases, wherein the right to life of those victims was allegedly taken away by the petitioner and other accused.”” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026mhc2302-saba-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-1616830#:~:text=Bench%20of%20Justice,and%20other%20accused.%22
- Cvk j bench Madras High Court says driving at high speed on ring road is not negligence since… | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-says-driving-at-high-speed-on-ring-road-is-not-negligence-since
- Good evening, Mr. Sekar, This is Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal. Recently, the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (North) passed an order in a medical negligence case handled by me, awarding compensation of ₹1 Crore to the complainant against three doctors based in Chennai. This case may be useful for young aspiring advocates and the public to understand important aspects of medical negligence jurisprudence. I would therefore request you to kindly consider publishing this judgment on your esteemed website to create greater legal awareness. I would be happy to share the order copy and any additional details required. Regards, Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal
More
Recent Posts
- T. G. V. Ramani Gopal. Recently, the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (North) passed an order in a medical negligence case handled by me, awarding compensation of ₹1 Crore to the complainant against three doctors based in Chennai.
- THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP Nos. 18045 of 2025 and 1872 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.11843 of 2025 and 1237 of 2026 N. Lakshman Reddy S/o.N.Yellareddy, Authorised Attorney/Manager, M/s.NSK Clearing and Forwarding, New No.194 (Old No.236), Thambu Cheety Street, George Town, Parrys, Chennai-600 001.
- “Bench of Justice B. Pugalendhi held, “The Courts are obligated to protect the rights of the accused persons and protect their personal liberty pending disposal of the criminal appeal. At the same time, the Courts are also answerable to the victims in the murder cases, wherein the right to life of those victims was allegedly taken away by the petitioner and other accused.”” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026mhc2302-saba-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-1616830#:~:text=Bench%20of%20Justice,and%20other%20accused.%22
- Cvk j bench Madras High Court says driving at high speed on ring road is not negligence since… | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-says-driving-at-high-speed-on-ring-road-is-not-negligence-since
- Good evening, Mr. Sekar, This is Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal. Recently, the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (North) passed an order in a medical negligence case handled by me, awarding compensation of ₹1 Crore to the complainant against three doctors based in Chennai. This case may be useful for young aspiring advocates and the public to understand important aspects of medical negligence jurisprudence. I would therefore request you to kindly consider publishing this judgment on your esteemed website to create greater legal awareness. I would be happy to share the order copy and any additional details required. Regards, Adv. T. G. V. Ramani Gopal