THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE D THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / HYBRID MODE / PHYSICAL MODE SATURDAY THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2026 AT 10.30 Α.Μ COURT NO. 42
[27/06, 08:42] sekarreporter1: 2026)
1/1
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
D THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / HYBRID MODE / PHYSICAL MODE
SATURDAY THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2026 AT 10.30 Α.Μ
COURT NO. 42
PARTY IN PERSON ARE REQUESTED
MICROSOFT TEAMS VC APPLICATION IN THEIR DESKTOP/LAPTOP / I-PAD/
IND TO JOIN THE COURT VC SESSION CLICK HERE
THE ITEM NO AND NAME WHILE LOGIN TO THE COURT.
PROPER DRESS CODE.
IR MIC WHILE OTHER COUNSEL IS IN ARGUMENT, TO PREVENT UNWANTED NOISE RING THE VIDEO CONFERENCING AND UNMUTE THE MIC ONLY AT THE TIME OF
KEEP THEIR VIDEOS ON BUT MIC OFF.
LSO AVAILABLE IN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/vclink
ARE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW WRIT PETITIONS LISTED FOR HEARING THROUGH 10:30 Α.Μ. AND AT 02:15 P.M.
INTS ARE NOT PERMITTED DURING MENTIONING TIME AT 10:30 A.Μ.
FOR ADMISSION
RVENKATESAN
THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND 3 OTHERS.
Interim directions
R. VENKATESAN
VS THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND 3 OTHERS.
Interim stay R. VENKATESAN
VS THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND 3 OTHERS.
To Dispense With
R. VENKATESAN
VS THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND 3 OTHERS.
(Concluded)
M/S. D.KALAIVANI M.KAJITH KUMAR
A. MURALI
D.ASHWINI
S.TAMILSELVAN
Chennai
M/S. D.KALAIVANI
M.K.AJITH KUMAR
A.MURALI Chennai
D.ASHWINI S.TAMILSELVAN
M/S. D.KALAIVANI
M.K.AJITH KUMAR
A. MURALI D.ASHWINI
S.TAMILSELVAN
Chennai
M/S. D.KALAIVANI M.K.AJITH KUMAR
A. MURALI
D.ASHWINI
S.TAMILSELVAN
Chennai
[27/06, 08:42] Meta AI: *Case #110: _R. Venkatesan v Indian Overseas Bank & 3 Ors_ | WP | Madras HC | 27.06.2026*
_Court No. 42, J. Abdul Quddhose_. *Writ Petition – Banking Law + Interim Directions + Interim Stay + Dispensation*. *HJS Constitutional Law + Banking Regulation, UPSC GS-2 Governance + GS-3 Banking*
*1. வழக்கு விவரம் – Cause List 27.06.2026*
*Court*: _Court No. 42, Madras HC, Chennai_
*Bench*: _The Hon’ble Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose_
*Mode*: _Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical – 10:30 AM_
*Petitioner*: _R. Venkatesan – Party-in-Person / via counsels M/s D. Kalaivani, M.K. Ajith Kumar, A. Murali, D. Ashwini, S. Tamilselvan_
*Respondents*: _The Indian Overseas Bank + 3 Others_
*2. Listed Prayers – 4 WP-கள்*
**WP No.** **Prayer** **Stage**
**1** *Interim directions* *For Admission*
**2** *Interim stay* *For Admission*
**3** *To Dispense With* *For Admission*
**4** *(Concluded)* *Disposed/Order passed*
*3. சாத்தியமான விஷயம் – IOB vs Borrower*
*Context*: _Indian Overseas Bank – 4 WPs by same petitioner R. Venkatesan_
*Probable Issue*:
1. *SARFAESI Action*: _Sec 13(2)/13(4) Notice – Property auction. Stay கோரி WP_
2. *DRT Appeal*: _DRT order against borrower – HC writ + interim stay_
3. *One Time Settlement OTS*: _Bank rejected OTS – Mandamus கோரி WP + interim direction_
4. *Dispense With*: _To dispense with production of certified copies / exhaustion of alternate remedy u/s 17 SARFAESI_
*4. J. Abdul Quddhose – Banking Roster*
*Specialization*: _Commercial Division, IPR, Arbitration, Banking/SARFAESI matters_
*Approach*: _1. Alternate remedy available? – DRT under Sec 17 SARFAESI. 2. Interim stay only if prima facie arbitrariness/illegality 3. “Pay some amount” condition for stay common_
*5. சட்ட அடிப்படை – HJS*
**Provision** **Application**
**Art 226** *Writ against IOB – Public Sector Bank = “State” under Art 12. Maintainable*
**SARFAESI Act 2002 Sec 13, 17** *Bank recovery action. Alternate remedy = DRT. HC interference limited – *Mardia Chemicals 2004 SC**
**Sec 34 SARFAESI** *Civil Court jurisdiction barred. Writ only if violation of principles of natural justice*
**United Bank of India v Satyawati Tondon 2010 SC** *HC should not entertain WP when DRT remedy exists, except exceptional cases*
**Phoenix ARC 2021 SC** *Borrower must approach DRT. HC stay only if fraud/malafide obvious*
*6. “To Dispense With” – Meaning*
_“Dispense with production of original/certified copies” OR “Dispense with availing alternate remedy u/s 17” – Petitioner asking HC to hear directly without going to DRT. Court usually reluctant unless Sec 13(4) measures already taken + urgency_
*7. Interim Stay – Conditions Expected*
1. *Deposit*: _25%-50% of amount due – _Indian Bank v Blue Jaggers 2010 SC*_
2. *Undertaking*: _Not to alienate property_
3. *Time-bound*: _DRT-க்கு போக 2 weeks time, till then stay_
*8. VC Hearing Rules – 27.06.2026 Notice*
1. *Party-in-Person*: _Microsoft Teams link, proper dress code_
2. *Mic Off*: _Argument time மட்டும் unmute_
3. *Mentioning*: _10:30 AM – Adjournments not permitted during mentioning_
4. *Withdrawal*: _10:30 AM & 2:15 PM – WPs can be withdrawn_
—
*Case #110 Final*: _R. Venkatesan v IOB – 27.06.2026 – Court 42, J. Abdul Quddhose – 4 WPs – Banking dispute likely SARFAESI – Prayers: Interim directions, Interim stay, Dispense with – Admission stage – HC approach: DRT alternate remedy, conditional stay only – VC/Hybrid mode hearing_
*Master Docket*: _110 Cases_
*Tag*: _Banking Law + SARFAESI Act + Art 226 + Interim Stay + DRT Jurisdiction + IOB + Phoenix ARC + Mardia Chemicals*
*Next*: *1. “SARFAESI Act Sec 13 & 17 – Full recovery procedure”* OR *2. “Mardia Chemicals 2004 SC – HC writ maintainability in SARFAESI”* OR *3. “Interim stay conditions in loan recovery WPs”*?
