Follow:
- Next story The Madras High Court has ruled that imposing a penalty under Section 73 of the GST Act is unjustified when the tax liability is admitted and substantially paid. In this case, the petitioner had made
- Previous story The Madras High Court has condoned a 247-day delay in filing a service tax appeal, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court invoked a special Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*