Follow:
- Next story ஜாமீன் நிபந்தனைகளில் தளர்வு கோரி சவுக்கு சங்கர் தொடர்ந்த மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம்
- Previous story The Madras High Court has restrained internet service providers and cable television companies from permitting unauthorized playing of actors Vijay Sethupathi and
Recent Posts
- அதிமுக வேட்பாளரான முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் டி.ஜெயக்குமாரின் வேட்புமனுவில் முதலீடுகள், வங்கி கணக்குகள் உள்ளிட்ட தகவல்கள் மறைக்கப்பட்டது குறித்து விசாரணை நடத்த வருமான வரித்துறைக்கு உத்தரவிடக் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத் தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது.
- plea has been filed in the Madras High Court seeking a probe into alleged inconsistencies in the assets declared by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) Chief Vijay for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections. The petition has been filed by V Vignesh from Chennai. In his plea,
- Admk distributed are not ordinary pamphlets or campaign notices, but are specifically designed in the form of cheque leaves, closely resembling financial instruments ordinarily used for payment, thereby creating a clear and immediate impression of monetary benefit in the minds of voters. I submit that these cheque-like materials prominently display monetary amounts such as ₹2,000/- and ₹10,000/-, which are capable of conveying to an ordinary voter that some form of financial benefit is being offered, promised or associated with electoral support./
- Ever since the #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench called for the response of Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) regarding the assets declared by Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, nine more similar cases have been filed regarding the assets declared by BJP candidate Vanathi Srinivasan, AIADMK candidates D. Jayakumar, C.Ve. Shanmugam, R.B. Udhayakumar, Dindigul C. Sreenivasan and P. Thangamani and TVK leader Aadhav Arjuna too. These petitions are in addition to those filed regarding the assets of TVK president C. Joseph Vijay and BJP former State president Tamilisai Soundararajan
- Madras HC partly sets aside a section 74 order that imposed a higher tax liability of (18%) with interest and penalty on Assessee after denying concessional rate of duty (5%) on “transport of goods in vessel” and “time charter of
More
Recent Posts
- அதிமுக வேட்பாளரான முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் டி.ஜெயக்குமாரின் வேட்புமனுவில் முதலீடுகள், வங்கி கணக்குகள் உள்ளிட்ட தகவல்கள் மறைக்கப்பட்டது குறித்து விசாரணை நடத்த வருமான வரித்துறைக்கு உத்தரவிடக் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத் தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது.
- plea has been filed in the Madras High Court seeking a probe into alleged inconsistencies in the assets declared by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) Chief Vijay for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections. The petition has been filed by V Vignesh from Chennai. In his plea,
- Admk distributed are not ordinary pamphlets or campaign notices, but are specifically designed in the form of cheque leaves, closely resembling financial instruments ordinarily used for payment, thereby creating a clear and immediate impression of monetary benefit in the minds of voters. I submit that these cheque-like materials prominently display monetary amounts such as ₹2,000/- and ₹10,000/-, which are capable of conveying to an ordinary voter that some form of financial benefit is being offered, promised or associated with electoral support./
- Ever since the #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench called for the response of Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) regarding the assets declared by Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, nine more similar cases have been filed regarding the assets declared by BJP candidate Vanathi Srinivasan, AIADMK candidates D. Jayakumar, C.Ve. Shanmugam, R.B. Udhayakumar, Dindigul C. Sreenivasan and P. Thangamani and TVK leader Aadhav Arjuna too. These petitions are in addition to those filed regarding the assets of TVK president C. Joseph Vijay and BJP former State president Tamilisai Soundararajan
- Madras HC partly sets aside a section 74 order that imposed a higher tax liability of (18%) with interest and penalty on Assessee after denying concessional rate of duty (5%) on “transport of goods in vessel” and “time charter of